Table 1 QCs and SCs have distinctly different properties

From: Three functionally distinct classes of C-fibre nociceptors in primates

 

QC

SC

Signif.

Conduction velocity (m s−1)

0.89±.01 (118)

0.86±0.01 (93)

NS

Activity-dependent slowing of conduction (%)*

−21.5±0.8 (34)

−24.6±0.9 (33)

*

Response to 49 °C, 3 s

 Latency to first AP (ms)

202.1±6.5 (121)

770.0±57.0 (95)

***

 Peak discharge frequency (Hz)

70.5±2.7 (121)

6.99±0.6 (95)

***

 Time of Peak discharge (ms)

375.3±9.5 (121)

1844.1±84.3 (95)

***

 Total response (APs)

26.3±0.6 (121)

13.0±1.0 (95)

***

Response to heat staircase

 Heat Threshold (°C)

40.8±0.2 (114)

45.8±0.2 (91)

***

 Total response (APs)

32.8±1.1 (114)

13.5±1.0 (91)

***

Mechanical response

 Threshold (bar)

1.20±0.04 (121)

2.03±0.08 (95)

***

 Response to 8.9 bar (APs)*

20.7±1.3

13.8 ±1.6

**

Cold response (4 °C, 20 s)

 Incidence

11/79

2/60

#

Burn response (48 °C, 120 s)

 Response during burn (APs)

136±24 (12)

351±46 (9)

***

 Adaptation during burn (%)

29±4 (12)

76±17 (9)

**

 Change in heat threshold (°C)

−2.3±0.4 (12)

−4.1±0.8 (9)

*

 Change in response to staircase (%)

212±41 (12)

643±79 (9)

***

Chemical response

 Superficial cowhage

Incidence

19/22

20/21

NS

Total response (APs per 5 min)

97.1±13.7 (19)

49.0±8.3 (20)

**

 Superficial capsaicin

Incidence

15/15

1/15

###

Total response (APs per 5 min)

97.9±8.4

6.1±2.2

***

 Superficial histamine

Incidence

14/15

12/15

NS

Total response (APs per 5 min)

41.8±4.9

23.1±4.5

***

 Intradermal histamine*

Incidence

11/27

22/32

#

Total response (APs per 5 min)

15.4±3.6

28.9±4.0

**

 Intradermal β-alanine*

Incidence

27/27

12/32

###

Total response (APs per 5 min)

96.2±5.8

26.3±6.1

***

  1. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; Mann–Whitney U-test or t-test. #P<0.05; ###P<0.001; χ2 test.
  2. Data are stated as mean±s.e.m. Number of fibres contributing to the calculation of mean and s.e.m. is given in parentheses.
  3. *Data from cynomolgus and pigtail were not significantly different and therefore combined for analysis.
  4. Response to second 5 s of stimulus relative to the response during the first 5 s.
  5. From Johanek et al.8