Figure 5: Comparison of the energy and power densities of HGF-ECs with other state-of-art energy storage technologies. | Nature Communications

Figure 5: Comparison of the energy and power densities of HGF-ECs with other state-of-art energy storage technologies.

From: Holey graphene frameworks for highly efficient capacitive energy storage

Figure 5

(a) Photographs of one HGF film electrode and one assembled symmetric HGF-EC. (b) Gravimetric and volumetric energy densities (normalized by the total weight or volume of both electrodes in each EC) and volumetric stack energy densities (normalized by the volume of the whole EC including two electrodes, two current collectors, electrolyte and one separator without packaging) for ECs made from various carbon materials. Areal mass loading of electrode materials: activated carbon (AC: 5 to 10 mg cm−2) (ref. 4), single-walled carbon nanotube (5 mg cm−2) (ref. 31), activated microwave exfoliated GO (2.5 mg cm−2) (ref. 12), electrolyte-mediated graphene (10 mg cm−2) (ref. 16), HGF (10 mg cm−2). (c) Ragone plots of gravimetric energy density versus gravimetric power density for HGF-EC in comparison with lead-acid batteries3, lithium-ion battery3, commercial ECs3. (d) Ragone plots of volumetric energy density versus volumetric power density for HGF-EC in comparison with lead-acid batteries1,3, lithium thin-film battery32, commercial activated carbon-ECs4,15. The energy and power densities are normalized by the actual weight or volume of the entire device stack including two electrodes, two current collectors, electrolyte, one separator and packaging.

Back to article page