Table 2 Summary of GWAS scan and replication studies for the four SNPs.

From: Genome-wide association study identifies new susceptibility loci for epithelial ovarian cancer in Han Chinese women

SNP

Locus

Allele *

Proposed candidate

Stage

Population

MAF (cases/controls)

OR (95% CI)

P -value

P meta

P meta §

rs1413299

9q22.33

A/C

COL15A1/TGFBR1

Ia

N

0.48/0.38

1.53 (1.25–1.86)

2.47 × 10−5

7.20 × 10−6

1.88 × 10−8

    

Ib

SE

0.46/0.42

1.21 (1.04–1.41)

1.60 × 10−2

  
    

IIa

S

0.44/0.41

1.14 (0.97–1.36)

1.21 × 10−1

4.00 × 10−3

 
    

IIb

SE

0.46/0.42

1.22 (1.04–1.41)

1.16 × 10−2

  
    

III

N

0.42/0.38

1.20 (1.03–1.41)

1.89 × 10−2

  

rs1192691

10p11.21

C/A

NAMPTL/ANKRD30A

Ia

N

0.43/0.46

0.89 (0.73–1.07)

2.20 × 10−1

6.02 × 10−5

2.62 × 10−8

    

Ib

SE

0.38/0.46

0.71 (0.60–0.83)

2.48 × 10−5

  
    

IIa

S

0.38/0.41

0.89 (0.75–1.06)

1.82 × 10−1

3.00 × 10−3

 
    

IIb

SE

0.38/0.44

0.80 (0.68–0.93)

4.50 × 10−3

  
    

III

N

0.41/0.46

0.81 (0.70–0.95)

8.74 × 10−3

  

rs11175194

12q14.2

G/A

SRGAP1

Ia

N

0.32/0.40

0.72 (0.59–0.88)

1.32 × 10−3

9.75 × 10−5

1.14 × 10−7

    

Ib

SE

0.34/0.38

0.82 (0.70–0.96)

1.61 × 10−2

  
    

IIa

S

0.38/0.43

0.83 (0.70–0.98)

3.06 × 10−2

3.58 × 10−3

 
    

IIb

SE

0.36/0.40

0.86 (0.73–1.00)

5.01 × 10−2

  
    

III

N

0.37/0.41

0.84 (0.72–0.98)

2.84 × 10−2

  

rs633862

9q34.2

A/G

ABO/SURF6

Ia

N

0.40/0.48

0.72 (0.59–0.87)

8.05 × 10−4

2.99 × 10−5

8.57 × 10−7

    

Ib

SE

0.41/0.45

0.80 (0.68–0.95)

8.35 × 10−3

  
    

IIa

S

0.50/0.55

0.85 (0.72–1.01)

5.75 × 10−2

2.38 × 10−2

 
    

IIb

SE

0.41/0.43

0.90 (0.77–1.05)

1.92 × 10−1

  
    

III

N

0.42/0.46

0.84 (0.72–0.98)

2.89 × 10−2

  
  1. CI, confidence interval; GWAS, genome-wide association study; MAF, minor allele frequency; N, Northern population; OR, odds ratio; S, Southern population; SE, Southeastern population; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.
  2. *Major allele/minor allele.
  3. P-value, OR and 95% CI were assessed under an additive model using logistic regression adjusted for age and the first three principal components of population stratification in stage I, and adjusted for age in stages II and III.
  4. Meta-analysis P-value of each stage.
  5. §Meta-analysis P-value for all three stages.