Figure 2: Network structure influences the evolution of diseases on real and theoretical contact networks. | Nature Communications

Figure 2: Network structure influences the evolution of diseases on real and theoretical contact networks.

From: Evolution and emergence of infectious diseases in theoretical and real-world networks

Figure 2

(a,b) Graphical representation of the networks. Large red or blue circles represent nodes with a high degree, small purple or green circles represent nodes with a low degree for the empirical and theoretical networks, respectively. (c,e) The probability that a single disease causes an epidemic (the emergence probability), Pemerge, versus the scaled transmissibility τ=β(‹k›−1)/γ. β is varied and τ represents the expression for the basic reproductive ratio for the uniform network. The thick grey line indicates the emergence probability for a well-mixed network, Pemerge=1−1/R0. The transmissibility value at which Pemerge becomes non-zero (that is, the epidemic threshold) depends on the network. (d,f) Dynamics of new disease variants. The probability of fixation, Pfix, versus the selective advantage, r=β2/β1, of a new disease variant is strongly influenced by the population structure, but is not predicted by Pemerge. The thick grey line indicates the fixation probability in a well-mixed network, . (g) The selection exponent, α, is calculated by fitting Pfix versus r to equation (27). Lower values mean that selection is suppressed compared to the uniform network. For a uniform or well-mixed population we expect α=1. Fits are shown by the solid lines in panels (d) and (f).

Back to article page