Figure 4: Detection of bit-flip errors. | Nature Communications

Figure 4: Detection of bit-flip errors.

From: Detecting bit-flip errors in a logical qubit using stabilizer measurements

Figure 4

(a) Sequence used to assess performance of bit-flip QEC. After encoding by gates, either coherent (θ∈[0,π]) or incoherent (θ=0 or π) errors are introduced with single-qubit bit-flip probability perr. Next, parallelized stabilizer measurements are either performed or replaced by an equivalent idling period. Partial tomography at this point is used to obtain the three-qubit fidelity F3Q and the logical fidelity FL. The calculation of FL assumes incoherent second-round errors with the same perr and a perfect decoding (dashed boxes). (b) Three-qubit fidelity F3Q as a function of perr with and without QEC under two scenarios: coherent errors applied on Dm (squares) and on all data qubits (circles). Standard deviations (0.005 for squares, 0.004 for circles) estimated by bootstrapping are smaller than the symbol size. The dashed line indicates the fidelity ceiling imposed by encoding errors. (c) FL as function of perr, obtained from the same data as in b. The average standard deviation of 0.005 is smaller than the symbol size. The individual contributions of the six cardinal states to F3Q and FL are shown in Supplementary Fig. 7. (d) FL for all combinations of one and zero incoherent errors on all data qubits before and after QEC or idling. Error combinations are labelled m/n, with m (n) the number of errors before (after) QEC or idling. The case 1/1 is divided in two: errors on the same data qubit (1/1a) or on different qubits (1/1b).

Back to article page