Figure 3: Kinematics data results from experiment 1 (n=14).
From: Causative role of left aIPS in coding shared goals during human–avatar complementary joint actions
These results indicate participants were truly adapting to the avatar’s movements and recruited sensory–motor simulative processes during the task. ‘Corr’, corrections; ‘No-corr’, no-corrections. Error bars indicate s.e.m. ***P<0.001, **P<0.01 and *P<0.05. (a) Illustration of the action-type × clip-type × movement-type significant interaction (F(1,13)=10.9, P=0.006) emerged from the repeated measures ANOVA on maxH (z-scores mean values). For the sake of simplicity, we did not explicitly report in the figure the significance of the comparison between power and precision grips in all conditions (all P values ≤0.007, also indicated by the significant main effect of movement-type; Table 1). (b) Illustration of the action-type × clip-type × movement-type significant interaction (F(1,13)=19.9, P<0.001) emerged from the repeated measures ANOVA on maxAp (z-scores mean values). For the sake of simplicity, we did not explicitly report in the figure the significance of the comparison between power and precision grips in all conditions (all P values ≤0.001, also indicated by the significant main effect of movement-type; Table 1).
