Figure 3: Non-resonant, field-dependent detection of driven spin-wave excitations. | Nature Communications

Figure 3: Non-resonant, field-dependent detection of driven spin-wave excitations.

From: Nanometre-scale probing of spin waves using single electron spins

Figure 3

(a) Measurement sequence. The first π/2 pulse prepares an NV spin superposition, which is input into an echo sequence with two π pulses. Synchronized with this sequence, we apply microwave (MW) driving at frequency f during the central 2τ period of free evolution to excite spin-wave excitations in the disc. We read out the final phase ϕ of the NV spin state by measuring the projection on the x and y axis. (b) Experimentally determined effective magnetic field Beff at NVB and NVA as a function of MW-driving frequency f and external static magnetic field Bext. Beff is normalized by the square of the drive field measured on-chip using NVref. The dashed line is a numerical calculation of the ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) of the disc. For NVA, the a.c. Stark effect is visible as an enhanced signal in an 300-MHz frequency band between the ESR frequency and the dashed-dotted line over the entire magnetic field range. We use the sign of the Stark effect to determine the sign of Beff in these measurements. Scale bar, 1 μm. (c) Numerically calculated spatial profile of the time-averaged change in the disc’s longitudinal magnetization ΔMx relative to the saturation magnetization MS under spatially uniform driving with a 5 G MW field and the associated stray magnetic field ΔB in the NV-plane, for two MW frequencies close to the FMR f1=fFMR−0.1 GHz and f2=fFMR−0.3 GHz. We use an external static field Bext=450 G, corresponding to the highest field used in the measurements in b, at which we expect the disc magnetization to be the most homogeneous and resemblant of the calculated magnetization. (d) Comparison of measured and calculated FMR lineshapes at Bext=450 G for NVB and NVA. The sign, amplitude and width of the lineshapes accurately match the calculations. The 4% difference in frequency presumably results from a difference in the disc’s saturation magnetization and/or fabrication-related imperfections. Error bars represent ±1 standard deviation determined statistically from typically100 repetitions of the same measurement.

Back to article page