Table 1 Associations of 4 SNPs to CHD in the GWA scan and validation studies.

From: Association analysis identifies new risk loci for congenital heart disease in Chinese populations

Chr. (cytoband)

SNP

Associated gene

Study

MAF

ORadd(95% CI)*

Padd*

    

Cases

Controls

  

4q31.22

rs1400558

EDNRA

GWAS

0.39

0.33

1.30(1.14–1.47)

8.07 × 10−5

 

G/A

 

Validation I

0.36

0.34

1.13(1.05–1.21)

1.18 × 10−3

   

Validation II

0.37

0.34

1.15(1.04–1.28)

9.11 × 10−3

   

Combined

0.37

0.33

1.17(1.11–1.23)

2.75 × 10−9

   

Validation III§

0.36

0.32

1.18(1.06–1.31)

2.91 × 10−3

   

All combined||

0.37

0.33

1.15(1.10–1.21)

1.63 × 10−9

9p24.2

rs7863990

SMARCA2

GWAS

0.11

0.07

1.54(1.25–1.90)

4.66 × 10−5

 

C/T

 

Validation I

0.10

0.08

1.20(1.06–1.35)

3.00 × 10−3

   

Validation II

0.10

0.08

1.28(1.07–1.52)

6.30 × 10−3

   

Combined

0.10

0.08

1.29(1.18–1.40)

7.47 × 10−9

   

Validation III§

0.12

0.08

1.45(1.23–1.72)

1.76 × 10−5

   

All combined||

0.11

0.08

1.34(1.24–1.44)

3.71 × 10−14

12q24.13

rs2433752

TBX3TBX5

GWAS

0.15

0.20

0.72(0.61–0.84)

4.69 × 10−5

 

A/G

 

Validation I

0.18

0.20

0.86(0.79–0.94)

8.31 × 10−4

   

Validation II

0.17

0.21

0.79(0.69–0.90)

4.68 × 10−4

   

Combined

0.17

0.20

0.80(0.75–0.85)

1.80 × 10−11

   

Validation III§

0.18

0.22

0.82(0.72–0.92)

1.23 × 10−3

   

All combined||

0.17

0.20

0.83(0.78–0.88)

1.04 × 10−10

20q12

rs490514

PTPRT

GWAS

0.44

0.38

1.29(1.14–1.46)

5.53 × 10−5

 

A/G

 

Validation I

0.44

0.40

1.15(1.07–1.23)

8.75 × 10−5

   

Validation II

0.42

0.38

1.16(1.05–1.29)

5.33 × 10−3

   

Combined§

0.44

0.39

1.19(1.13–1.25)

3.53 × 10−11

   

Validation III§

0.44

0.39

1.22(1.10–1.35)

1.96 × 10−4

   

All combined§

0.44

0.39

1.19(1.13–1.24)

1.20 × 10−13

  1. CHD, congenital heart disease; CI, confidence interval; GWAS, genome-wide association study; MAF, minor allele frequency; OR, odds ratio; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms.
  2. *ORs, 95% CIs and P values were estimated in an additive model using logistic regression analyses. First principal component were adjusted in GWAS stage.
  3. Major/minor alleles.
  4. GWAS, Validation I and II were pooled together.
  5. §ORs, 95% CIs and P values of Validation IIIwere derived from meta-analysis of Validation IIIa and Validation IIIb.
  6. ||GWAS, Validation I, II and III were pooled together.