Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature new biology
  3. letters to editor
  4. article
Two Genetic Types of Normal Colour Vision?
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Letters to Editor
  • Published: 11 April 1973

Two Genetic Types of Normal Colour Vision?

  • J. W. METZ1 &
  • R. F. BALLIET1 

Nature New Biology volume 242, page 190 (1973)Cite this article

  • 284 Accesses

  • 8 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Waaler1,2 reported that normal human colour vision could be divided into two types (bimodally distributed) on the basis of anomaloscope equations (Rayleigh3 matches), and that these two types are determined by hereditary factors in the X chromosome. He also found a perfect correspondence for male subjects between the two types and the loci on the spectrum at which they see “pure” green. Those seeing pure green around 515 nm and requiring relatively less red light in their anomaloscope matches were called G1 while those seeing pure green around 525 nm and requiring relatively more red light in their matches were called G24.

Article PDF

References

  1. Waaler, G. H. M., Nature, 215, 406 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Waaler, G. H. M., Nature, 218, 688 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rayleigh, Lord, Nature, 25, 64 (1881).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Linksz, A., and Waaler, G. H. M., Nature, 218, 687 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shuster, A., Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), 48, 140 (1890).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Houston, R. A., Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), A, 102, 353 (1923).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hailwood, J. G., and Roaf, H. E., J. Physiol., 91, 36 (1937–1938).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nelson, J. H., Proc. Phys. Soc. (London), 50, 661 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pickford, R. W., Individual Differences in Colour Vision (Routledge and Kegan Paul, Ltd., London, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schmidt, I., J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 45, 514 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pickford, R. W., and Lakowski, R., Brit. J. Physiol. Optics, 17, 131 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rushton, W. A. H., and Baker, H. D., Vis. Res., 4, 75 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rubin, M. L., Amer. J. Ophthalmol., 52, 166 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Richards, W., J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 57, 1047 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hurvich, L. M., Jameson, D., and Cohen, J. D., Percept, and Psychophysics, 4, 65 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Verriest, G., Now. rev. d'Opt. Appl., 1, 107 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kalmus, H., and Case, R. M., Ann. Hum. Genet., Lond., 35, 369 (1972).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wright, W. D., Researches in Normal and Defective Color Vision (C. V. Mosby Co., St. Louis, 1947).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Smith-Kettlewell Institute and Department of Visual Sciences, University of the Pacific, 2232 Webster Street, San Francisco, California, 94115

    J. W. METZ & R. F. BALLIET

Authors
  1. J. W. METZ
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. F. BALLIET
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

METZ, J., BALLIET, R. Two Genetic Types of Normal Colour Vision?. Nature New Biology 242, 190 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1038/newbio242190a0

Download citation

  • Received: 10 October 1972

  • Issue date: 11 April 1973

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/newbio242190a0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature New Biology (Nature New Biology)

ISSN 2058-1092 (online)

ISSN 0090-0028 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing