Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Technical Report
  • Published:

Targeted gene alteration in Caenorhabditis elegans by gene conversion

Abstract

Now that some genomes have been completely sequenced, the ability to direct specific mutations into genomes is particularly desirable. Here we present a method to create mutations in the Caenorhabditis elegans genome efficiently through transgene-directed, transposon-mediated gene conversion. Engineered deletions targeted into two genes show that the frequency of obtaining the desired mutation was higher using this approach than using standard transposon insertion-deletion approaches. We also targeted an engineered green fluorescent protein insertion-replacement cassette to one of these genes, thereby confirming that custom alleles of different types can be created in vitro to make the corresponding mutations in vivo. This approach should also be applicable to heterologous transposons in C. elegans and other organisms, including vertebrates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: General strategy for targeted alteration by gene conversion.
Figure 2: Genomic structure of targeted genes.
Figure 3: Gene conversion of a deletion in tkr-1.
Figure 4: Gene conversion of a deletion in frm-3.
Figure 5: Gene conversion of an insertion in frm-3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Broverman, S., MacMorris, M. & Blumenthal, T. Alteration of Caenorhabditis elegans gene expression by targeted transformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 4359–4363 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mello, C. & Fire, A. DNA transformation. Methods Cell Biol. 48, 451–482 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berezikov, E., Bargmann, C.I. & Plasterk, R.H. Homologous gene targeting in Caenorhabditis elegans by biolistic transformation. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, e40 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zwaal, R.R., Broeks, A., van Meurs, J., Groenen, J.T. & Plasterk, R.H. Target-selected gene inactivation in Caenorhabditis elegans by using a frozen transposon insertion mutant bank. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 7431–7435 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jansen, G., Hazendonk, E., Thijssen, K.L. & Plasterk, R.H. Reverse genetics by chemical mutagenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat. Genet. 17, 119–121 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, L.X. et al. High-throughput isolation of Caenorhabditis elegans deletion mutants. Genome Res. 9, 859–867 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Plasterk, R.H.A. & van Leunen, H.G.A.M. Transposons. in C. elegans II vol. 33 (eds. Riddle, D.L., Blumenthal, T., Meyer, B.J. & Priess, J.R.) 97–116 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rezsohazy, R., van Luenen, H.G., Durbin, R.M. & Plasterk, R.H. Tc7, a Tc1-hitch hiking transposon in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 4048–4054 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Le, Q.H., Turcotte, K. & Bureau, T. Tc8 a tourist-like transposon in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 158, 1081–1088 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson, P. Mutagenesis. Methods Cell Biol. 48, 31–58 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Korswagen, H.C., Durbin, R.M., Smits, M.T. & Plasterk, R.H. Transposon Tc1-derived, sequence-tagged sites in Caenorhabditis elegans as markers for gene mapping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 14680–14685 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Williams, B.D. Genetic mapping with polymorphic sequence-tagged sites. Methods Cell Biol. 48, 81–96 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Martin, E. et al. Identification of 1088 new transposon insertions of Caenorhabditis elegans: a pilot study toward large-scale screens. Genetics 162, 521–524 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Parks, A.L. et al. Systematic generation of high-resolution deletion coverage of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Nat. Genet. 36, 288–292 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thibault, S.T. et al. A complementary transposon tool kit for Drosophila melanogaster using P and piggyBac. Nat. Genet. 36, 283–287 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rushforth, A.M. & Anderson, P. Splicing removes the Caenorhabditis elegans transposon Tc1 from most mutant pre-mRNAs. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 422–429 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Plasterk, R.H. Reverse genetics: from gene sequence to mutant worm. Methods Cell Biol. 48, 59–80 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Engels, W.R. P elements in Drosophila. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 204, 103–123 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Plasterk, R.H. & Groenen, J.T. Targeted alterations of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome by transgene instructed DNA double strand break repair following Tc1 excision. EMBO J. 11, 287–290 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gloor, G.B., Nassif, N.A., Johnson-Schlitz, D.M., Preston, C.R. & Engels, W.R. Targeted gene replacement in Drosophila via P element-induced gap repair. Science 253, 1110–1117 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Barrett, P.L. Ph.D. Thesis. (Harvard University, 1999).

  22. Gu, T., Orita, S. & Han, M. Caenorhabditis elegans SUR-5, a novel but conserved protein, negatively regulates LET-60 Ras activity during vulval induction. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 4556–4564 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, S., Thaler, D.S. & Libchaber, A. Signal and noise in bridging PCR. BMC Biotechnol. 2, 13 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stinchcomb, D.T., Shaw, J.E., Carr, S.H. & Hirsh, D. Extrachromosomal DNA transformation of Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol. Cell. Biol. 5, 3484–3496 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fire, A., Harrison, S.W. & Dixon, D. A modular set of lacZ fusion vectors for studying gene expression in Caenorhabditis elegans. Gene 93, 189–198 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Collins, J., Saari, B. & Anderson, P. Activation of a transposable element in the germ line but not the soma of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 328, 726–728 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Johnson-Schlitz, D.M. & Engels, W.R. P-element-induced interallelic gene conversion of insertions and deletions in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 7006–7018 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nassif, N., Penney, J., Pal, S., Engels, W.R. & Gloor, G.B. Efficient copying of nonhomologous sequences from ectopic sites via P-element-induced gap repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 1613–1625 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sengupta, P., Chou, J.H. & Bargmann, C.I. odr-10 encodes a seven transmembrane domain olfactory receptor required for responses to the odorant diacetyl. Cell 84, 899–909 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mello, C.C., Kramer, J.M., Stinchcomb, D. & Ambros, V. Efficient gene transfer in C. elegans: extrachromosomal maintenance and integration of transforming sequences. EMBO J. 10, 3959–3970 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bessereau, J.L. et al. Mobilization of a Drosophila transposon in the Caenorhabditis elegans germ line. Nature 413, 70–74 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Raz, E., van Luenen, H.G., Schaerringer, B., Plasterk, R.H.A. & Driever, W. Transposition of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans Tc3 element in the zebrafish Danio rerio. Curr. Biol. 8, 82–88 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Dupuy, A.J. et al. Mammalian germ-line transgenesis by transposition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 4495–4499 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Horie, K. et al. Characterization of Sleeping Beauty transposition and its application to genetic screening in mice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 9189–9207 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Williams, B.D., Schrank, B., Huynh, C., Shownkeen, R. & Waterston, R.H. A genetic mapping system in Caenorhabditis elegans based on polymorphic sequence-tagged sites. Genetics 131, 609–624 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Miller, K.G. et al. A genetic selection for Caenorhabditis elegans synaptic transmission mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 12593–12598 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Koelle, M.R. & Horvitz, H.R. EGL-10 regulates G protein signaling in the C. elegans nervous system and shares a conserved domain with many mammalian proteins. Cell 84, 115–125 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Collins, C. Almeida, Q. Boese and the other members of the laboratory of J. Collins for sharing unpublished results and providing the TW404 strain; R. Plasterk for his advice and effort in isolating the tkr-1 (pk69) allele; L. Ségalat for providing the frm-3 (cxP4618) allele; C. Gerard for support during initial stages of the project; E. Schwarz for help with Wormbase; A. Fire and M. Han for plasmids; T. Stiernagle and the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center for strains; the Sanger Centre for cosmids; and H. Weinstein for continued support. This work was partially supported by a grant from the US National Institutes of Health to V.G.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

Original PCR gel of first screening round in pilot study. (PDF 73 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2

Southern hybridization analysis of N2 and tkr-1 (qa100). (PDF 69 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 3

Southern hybridization analysis of N2, frm-3 (cxP4618), (fg2) and (fg3) (frm-3 probe). (PDF 40 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 4

Southern hybridization analysis of N2, frm-3 (cxP4618), (fg2) and (fg3) (GFP probe). (PDF 222 kb)

Supplementary Methods (PDF 58 kb)

Supplementary Video 1

(1) Wild-type (N2), (2) frm-3 (fg2) and (3) frm-3 (fg2); Ex[pfrm-3A + pTG96] animals. Video captures were taken at benchtop conditions using a Nikon SMZ-2B stereomicroscope and Nikon Coolpix 950 digital camera, connected to a Macintosh computer running the program BTV Pro. Apple's iMovie program was used to edit the video. (MOV 59 kb)

Supplementary Video 2

(1) Wild-type (N2), (2) frm-3 (fg2) and (3) frm-3 (fg2); Ex[pfrm-3A + pTG96] animals. Video captures were taken at benchtop conditions using a Nikon SMZ-2B stereomicroscope and Nikon Coolpix 950 digital camera, connected to a Macintosh computer running the program BTV Pro. Apple's iMovie program was used to edit the video. (MOV 172 kb)

Supplementary Video 3

(1) Wild-type (N2), (2) frm-3 (fg2) and (3) frm-3 (fg2); Ex[pfrm-3A + pTG96] animals. Video captures were taken at benchtop conditions using a Nikon SMZ-2B stereomicroscope and Nikon Coolpix 950 digital camera, connected to a Macintosh computer running the program BTV Pro. Apple's iMovie program was used to edit the video. (MOV 113 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barrett, P., Fleming, J. & Göbel, V. Targeted gene alteration in Caenorhabditis elegans by gene conversion. Nat Genet 36, 1231–1237 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1459

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1459

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing