Supplementary Figure 4: Gene signature of CXCR3+CXCR5+ TFH cells and the expression of CXCR3 and CXCR5 in IFN-γ+ cells | Nature Immunology

Supplementary Figure 4: Gene signature of CXCR3+CXCR5+ TFH cells and the expression of CXCR3 and CXCR5 in IFN-γ+ cells

From: Protective neutralizing influenza antibody response in the absence of T follicular helper cells

Supplementary Figure 4

(a) Construction map of the Venus-targeted Ifng locus (Top). The IRES-Venus cassette was inserted immediately after the stop codon of Ifng gene. Splenocytes from Ifng Venus reporter mice were stimulated with anti-TCRβ antibody in the presence of IL-12 and anti-IL-4 antibody (for TH1), or IL-4 and anti-IFN-γ antibody (for TH2). Five days after the stimulation, ex-vivo induced TH1 and TH2 cells were re-stimulated with anti-TCRβ antibody, and intracellular staining of IFN-γ and IL-4 (bottom) were carried out. (b) Heatmap of TH1, TH2, TH17, and TFH signature genes, and heatmap of common signature genes of TH1 and TFH in CXCR5+ and CXCR3+CXCR5+ cells. CXCR5 single positive and CXCR3 CXCR5 double positive CD4+ T cells were sorted from vaccinated C57BL/6 mice at day14 post vaccination. The RNA sequencing analysis of sorted populations was carried out by Hiseq. (c) Comparison analysis of CXCR3+CXCR5+ and CXCR5+ TFH cells. Fold-change of gene expression in CXCR3+CXCR5+ versus CXCR5+ cells are plotted as histogram. Major TFH signature genes are shown in red. (d) Flow cytometry analysis of Venus expression was examined in splenic CD4+T cells from vaccinated ifng Venus reporter mice at 14 days after immunization. The CD4+ T cells were separated into 3 fractions based on the magnitude of Venus expression (Negative (Neg), intermediated (Med) and High). Each population was analyzed for PD-1, CXCR5, and CXCR3 expression. The bar graph shows cell number of TFH and CD4+T cells in Neg, Med, and High fractions (n=3).

Back to article page