Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Feature
  • Published:

Peer review: Close inspection

To improve your own papers, learn how to evaluate other scientists' work.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

Research profiles: A tag of one's own

Scientist registry unveils plan to recognize efforts of peer-reviewers

The scientists who get credit for peer review

Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing

The future of publishing: A new page

Nature's peer-review policy guide

Related external links

BioMed Central: A beginner's guide to peer review

Peer reviewers share their experience

Committee on Publication Ethics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schiermeier, Q. Peer review: Close inspection. Nature 533, 279–281 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7602-279a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7602-279a

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Careers

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Careers newsletter — what matters in careers research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Careers