Good experimental designs limit the impact of variability and reduce sample-size requirements.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout



References
Krzywinski, M.I. & Altman, N. Nat. Methods 10, 1139–1140 (2013).
Krzywinski, M.I. & Altman, N. Nat. Methods 11, 355–356 (2014).
Gelman, A. & Stern, H. Am. Stat. 60, 328–331 (2006).
Krzywinski, M.I. & Altman, N. Nat. Methods 11, 215–216 (2014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krzywinski, M., Altman, N. Designing comparative experiments. Nat Methods 11, 597–598 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2974
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2974
This article is cited by
-
Sources of variation
Nature Methods (2015)
-
ETD Outperforms CID and HCD in the Analysis of the Ubiquitylated Proteome
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry (2015)
-
Analysis of variance and blocking
Nature Methods (2014)
-
Nested designs
Nature Methods (2014)