Supplementary Figure 2: Robustness analysis of all clustering methods. | Nature Methods

Supplementary Figure 2: Robustness analysis of all clustering methods.

From: Comparing the performance of biomedical clustering methods

Supplementary Figure 2

Robustness of all clustering methods on five selected data sets reported as mean F1 scores over ten repetitions. For the two biomedical data sets (astral1_161 and bone_marrow) the noise levels are 5% (low) and 10% (high). For the three synthetic data sets, we report the performance on higher noise levels: 20% (low) and 40% (high). See Table 1 for definitions of methods’ abbreviations. Empty fields correspond to an inability of the corresponding tool to cluster the data set. This happens when a tool needs feature vectors for the objects but the data set is given as similarity matrix.

Back to article page