Supplementary Figure 11: Latent spatial tuning revealed across multiple sessions.

a. Scatter plots of original position versus position shift after 2 elapsed sessions for WT and Df(16)A^± mice. Cells that were not a place cell in the middle session are marked in magenta and cyan for WT and Df(16)A^± data, respectively. Even cells that were not a place cell in the intervening session still cluster around 0, suggesting that they retain some latent place preference that is either not expressed or not detectable. Vertical dashed line denotes reward location. Horizontal dashed line marks fields that do not shift at all. Green diagonal dashed line marks fields that remap directly to the reward location. b. Mean place field shift variance across all positions for cells paired by 1 session elapsed, 2 sessions elapsed, 2 sessions elapsed for cells that were not a place cell in the intervening session, and 2 iterations of the model. Two-session elapsed place cells are equally stable whether or not the cell was a place cell in the middle session, which is also the same as two iterations of the model.