Table 1 Bibliographical characteristics of 79 included meta-analyses on COPD treatments

From: Methodological quality of meta-analyses on treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study using the AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) tool

Bibliographical characteristics

Results

Cochrane review

47 (59.5%)

An update of a previous meta-analysis (MA)

49 (62.0%)

Median impact factor of the journal for which the MA was published (range)

5.18 (0.00–6.25)

Median number of review authors (range)

4.00 (2–8)

Location of corresponding author

 North America

21 (26.6%)

 Europe

27 (34.2%)

 Australasia

21 (26.6%)

 Other regions

10 (12.7%)

Type of treatment

 Pharmacological

43 (54.4%)

 Non-pharmacological

36 (45. 6%)

Total number of included primary studies

1,099

Total number of participants in included primary studies

801,294

Number of MA that reported harm of the intervention

46 (58.2%)

Funding location of the MA

 Europe

23 (29.1%)

 Australia or New Zealand

9 (11.4%)

 Multiple region

9 (11.4%)

 North America

8 (10.2%)

 South America

1 (1.3%)

 Not reported

29 (36. 7%)

Number of MA that declared conflicts of interest

15 (19.0%)

Number of MA that declared no conflicts of interest

26 (32.9%)

Number of MA that did not mention conflicts of interest

38 (48.1%)

Number of MA that searched international databases

78 (98. 7%)

Median number of international databases searched (range)

4.00 (0–12)

Number of MA searched non-English databases

8 (10.1%)

Reporting of coverage year of search:

 Yes, reported both starting and ending years

26 (32.9%)

 Partially, only reported starting years

48 (60.8%)

 Not mentioned

5 (6.3%)

Search terms reported for one or more electronic databases

 Topics/free text/keywords/MeSH

62 (78.5%)

 Full Boolean

14 (17.7%)

 Readers are referred elsewhere for full search strategy

3 (3.8%)

Eligibility of study design

 

 RCT only

75 (94.9%)

 RCT and observational studies

4 (5.1%)

Eligibility criteria based on language of publication

 Included English publications only

11 (13.9%)

 English and languages other than English

42 (53.2%)

 Language criteria not reported

26 (32.9%)

Number of MA that included a PRISMA-Iike flow diagram

37 (46.8%)

Tools for assessing risk of bias of primary studies

 Cochrane risk of bias tool

31 (39.2%)

 Jadad scale

16 (20.3%)

 Pedro scale

6 (7.6%)

 Others

4 (5.1%)

 Two or more of the above-mentioned tools

13 (16.5%)

 Not reported

9 (11.4%)

  1. Abbreviations: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; MA, meta-analysis; RCT, randomised controlled trials.