Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Precedings
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature precedings
  3. articles
  4. article
Validation of a Multivariate Serum Profile for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Using a Prospective Multi-Site Collection
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Manuscript
  • Open access
  • Published: 20 July 2010

Validation of a Multivariate Serum Profile for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Using a Prospective Multi-Site Collection

  • Partha Seshaiah1,
  • Greg Bertenshaw1,
  • Tzong-Hao Chen1,
  • Katharine Bergstrom1,
  • Jinghua Zhao1,
  • James Mapes2,
  • Laurie Stephen2,
  • Suraj Amonkar1,
  • Michael McCollum3,
  • Brigitte Miller4,
  • Lynda Roman5,
  • Beth Karlan6,
  • Eva Chalas7,
  • Paul DiSilvestro8,
  • James Barter9,
  • James Orr Jr10,
  • Glenn Bigsby IV11,
  • Robert Holloway11,
  • Ronald Alvarez12,
  • Ping Yip1 &
  • …
  • Brian Mansfield1 

Nature Precedings (2010)Cite this article

  • 517 Accesses

  • 3 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

In previous studies we described the use of a retrospective collection of ovarian cancer and benign disease samples, in combination with a large set of multiplexed immunoassays and a multivariate pattern recognition algorithm, to develop an 11-biomarker classification profile that is predictive for the presence of epithelial ovarian cancer. In this study, customized, Luminex-based multiplexed immunoassay kits were GMP-manufactured and the classification profile was refined from 11 to 8 biomarkers (CA-125, epidermal growth factor receptor, CA 19-9, C-reactive protein, tenascin C, apolipoprotein AI, apolipoprotein CIII, and myoglobin). The customized kits and the 8-biomarker profile were then validated in a double-blinded manner using prospective samples collected from women scheduled for surgery, with a gynecologic oncologist, for suspicion of having ovarian cancer. The performance observed in model development held in validation, demonstrating 81.1% sensitivity (95% CI 72.6 – 87.9%) for invasive epithelial ovarian cancer and 85.4% specificity (95% CI 81.1 – 88.9%) for benign ovarian conditions. The specificity for normal healthy women was 95.6% (95% CI 83.6 – 99.2%). These results have encouraged us to undertake a second validation study arm, currently in progress, to examine the performance of the 8-biomarker profile on the population of women not under the surgical care of a gynecologic oncologist.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data-driven analysis of a validated risk score for ovarian cancer identifies clinically distinct patterns during follow-up and treatment

Article Open access 01 October 2022

Diagnostic measures comparison for ovarian malignancy risk in Epithelial ovarian cancer patients: a meta-analysis

Article Open access 27 August 2021

Deep plasma proteomics identifies and validates an eight-protein biomarker panel that separate benign from malignant tumors in ovarian cancer

Article Open access 12 June 2025

Article PDF

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Correlogic Systems, Inc., Germantown, MD https://www.nature.com/nature

    Partha Seshaiah, Greg Bertenshaw, Tzong-Hao Chen, Katharine Bergstrom, Jinghua Zhao, Suraj Amonkar, Ping Yip & Brian Mansfield

  2. Rules-Based Medicine, Inc., Austin, TX https://www.nature.com/nature

    James Mapes & Laurie Stephen

  3. The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Cancer Institute at Franklin Square Hospital, Baltimore, MD https://www.nature.com/nature

    Michael McCollum

  4. North East Oncology Associates, Concord, NC https://www.nature.com/nature

    Brigitte Miller

  5. University of Southern California, Norris Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA and Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Los Angeles, CA

    Lynda Roman

  6. Women’s Cancer Research Institute at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

    Beth Karlan

  7. SUNY at Stony Brook, NY, Stony Brook, NY https://www.nature.com/nature

    Eva Chalas

  8. Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI https://www.nature.com/nature

    Paul DiSilvestro

  9. Holy Cross Hospital, Silver Spring, MD https://www.nature.com/nature

    James Barter

  10. Florida Gynecologic Oncology, Fort Meyers, FL https://www.nature.com/nature

    James Orr Jr

  11. Florida Hospital Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL https://www.nature.com/nature

    Glenn Bigsby IV & Robert Holloway

  12. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL https://www.nature.com/nature

    Ronald Alvarez

Authors
  1. Partha Seshaiah
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Greg Bertenshaw
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tzong-Hao Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Katharine Bergstrom
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jinghua Zhao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. James Mapes
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Laurie Stephen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Suraj Amonkar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Michael McCollum
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Brigitte Miller
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Lynda Roman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Beth Karlan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Eva Chalas
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Paul DiSilvestro
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. James Barter
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. James Orr Jr
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Glenn Bigsby IV
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Robert Holloway
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Ronald Alvarez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Ping Yip
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Brian Mansfield
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Mansfield.

Rights and permissions

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seshaiah, P., Bertenshaw, G., Chen, TH. et al. Validation of a Multivariate Serum Profile for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Using a Prospective Multi-Site Collection. Nat Prec (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2010.4667.1

Download citation

  • Received: 13 July 2010

  • Accepted: 20 July 2010

  • Published: 20 July 2010

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2010.4667.1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • biomarkers
  • Ovarian cancer
  • Ovarian malignancies
  • diagnostic
  • Multivariate index assay
  • Classification algorithm
  • Luminex
  • Multiplexed immunoassays
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Precedings (Nat Preced)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing