Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Device therapy

Variation in the use of inferior vena cava filters for VTE

Wide variation exists in the use of inferior vena cava filters for the treatment of venous thromboembolism, possibly because of a deficit of evidence on the efficacy of these devices, and a lack of consensus on their use. Future guidelines should be evidence-based and account for the development of novel anticoagulants.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

References

  1. White, R. H. et al. High variation between hospitals in vena cava filter use for venous thromboembolism. JAMA Intern. Med. 173, 506–512 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Young, T., Tang, H. & Hughes, R. Vena caval filters for the prevention of pulmonary embolism. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD006212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006212.pub4.

  3. Athanasoulis, C. A. et al. Inferior vena caval filters: review of a 26-year single-center clinical experience. Radiology 216, 54–66 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. PREPIC Study Group. Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism: the PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study. Circulation 112, 416–422 (2005).

  5. Kaufman, J. A. et al. Development of a research agenda for inferior vena cava filters: proceedings from a multidisciplinary research consensus panel. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 20, 697–707 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaufman, J. A. et al. Guidelines for use of retrievable and convertible vena cava filters: report from the Society of Interventional Radiology multidisciplinary consensus conference. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 17, 449–459 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aziz, F., Spate, K., Wong, J., Aruny, J. & Sumpio, B. Changing patterns in the use of inferior vena cava filters: review of a single center experience. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 205, 564–569 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dossett, L. A., Adams, R. C. & Cotton, B. A. Unwarranted national variation in the use of prophylactic inferior vena cava filters after trauma: an analysis of the National Trauma Databank. J. Trauma 70, 1066–1070 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Meltzer, A. J. et al. Clinical, demographic, and medicolegal factors associated with geographic variation in inferior vena cava filter utilization: an interstate analysis. Surgery 153, 683–688 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjeeva P. Kalva.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kalva, S., Athanasoulis, C. Variation in the use of inferior vena cava filters for VTE. Nat Rev Cardiol 10, 368–370 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2013.65

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2013.65

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing