Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Crystal structure of the post-chaperonin β-tubulin binding cofactor Rbl2p

Abstract

The folding pathway of tubulins includes highly specific interactions with a series of cofactors (A, B, C, D and E) after they are released from the eukaryotic chaperonin CCT. The 2.2 Å crystal structure of Rbl2p, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homolog of β-tubulin specific cofactor A, shows α-helical monomers forming a flat, slightly convex dimer. The surface of the molecule is dominated by polar and charged residues and lacks hydrophobic patches typically observed for chaperones that bind unfolded or partially folded proteins. This post-chaperonin cofactor is therefore clearly distinct from typical chaperones where hydrophobicity is a hallmark of substrate recognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Electron density.
Figure 2: Stereo diagrams of Rbl2p.
Figure 3: Secondary structure of Rbl2p and sequence comparison to mammalian cofactor A sequences.
Figure 4: Surface properties of Rbl2p.

Accession codes

Accessions

Protein Data Bank

References

  1. Ewalt, K.L., Hendrick, J.P., Houry, W.A. & Hartl, F.-U. Cell 90, 491–500 ( 1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hartl, F.-U. Nature 381, 571–580 ( 1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fenton, W.A. & Horwich, A.L. Protein Sci. 6, 743–760 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sigler, P.B. et al. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 581– 608 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Frydman, J. et al. EMBO J. 11, 4767–4778 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gao, Y., Thomas, J.O., Chow, R.L., Lee, G.-H. & Cowan, N.J. Cell 69, 1043– 1050 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yaffe, M.B. et al. Nature 358, 245–248 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sternlicht, H. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 9422–9426 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Farr, G.W., Scharl, E.C., Schumacher, R.J., Sondek, S. & Horwich, A.L. Cell 89, 927–937 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Klumpp, M., Baumeister, W. & Essen, L.-O. Cell 91, 263– 270 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ditzel, L. et al. Cell 93, 125–138 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Llorca, O. <et al. Nature Struct. Biol. 6, 639– 642 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu, Z., Horwich, A.L. & Sigler, P.B. Nature 388, 741– 749 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dobrzynski, J.K. et al. Biochemistry 35, 15870– 15882 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vainberg, I.E. et al. Cell 93, 863–873 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Geissler, S., Siegers, K. & Schiebel, E. EMBO J. 17, 952– 966 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gao, Y., Vainberg, I.E., Chow, R.L. & Cowan, N.J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 2478–2485 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tian, G. et al. Cell 86, 287–296 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tian, G. et al. J. Cell Biol. 138, 821– 832 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tian, G., Bhamidipati, A., Cowan, N.J. & Lewis, S.A. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 24054 – 24058 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Melki, R., Rommelaere, H., Leguy, R., Vandekerckhove, J. & Ampe, C. Biochemistry 35, 10422–10435 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Archer, J.E., Vega, L.R. & Solomon, F. Cell 82, 425– 434 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Archer, J., Magendantz, M., Vega, L.R. & Solomon, F. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 1757–1762 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gao, Y. et al. J. Cell Biol. 125, 989–996 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Llosa, M. et al. FEBS Lett. 397, 283–289 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Miller, S., Janin, J., Lesk, A.M. & Chothia, C. J. Mol. Biol. 196, 641–656 ( 1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nogales, E., Wolf, S.G. & Downing, K.H. Nature 391, 199– 203 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Braig, K. et al. Nature 371, 578–586 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fenton, W.A., Kashi, Y., Furtak, K. & Horwich, A.L. Nature 371, 614–619 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Flynn, G.C., Pohl, J., Flocco, M.T. & Rothman, J.E. Nature 353, 726–730 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhu, X. et al. Science 272, 1606–1614 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim, K.K., Kim, R. & Kim, S.-H. Nature 394, 596–599 ( 1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Leslie, A.G.W. Recent changes to the MOSFLM package for processing film and image plate data. (SERC Laboratory, Daresbury, Warrington, United Kingdom; 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4. Acta Crystallogr. D 50, 760–763 (1994).

  35. Sheldrick, G.M., Dauter, Z., Wilson, K.S., Hope, H. & Sieker, L.C. Acta Crystallogr. D 49, 18– 23 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kleywegt, G.J. & Jones, T.A. ESF/CCP4 Newsletter 28, 56–59 ( 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jones, T.A. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 11, 268–272 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Brünger, A. X-PLOR version 3.1. A system for crystallography and NMR. (Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut; 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Engh, R.A. & Huber, R. Acta Crystallogr. A 47, 392–400 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nicholls, A., Bharadwaj, R. & Honig, B. Biophys. J. 64, A166 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F. & Maniatis, T. In Molecular cloning.(ed. Nolan, C., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York; 1989).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Robert Huber for his generous support. The work was financially supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Steinbacher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steinbacher, S. Crystal structure of the post-chaperonin β-tubulin binding cofactor Rbl2p. Nat Struct Mol Biol 6, 1029–1032 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/14912

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/14912

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing