Figure 4 | Oncogene

Figure 4

From: A novel oncogenic BTK isoform is overexpressed in colon cancers and required for RAS-mediated transformation

Figure 4

p65BTK is a novel oncogenic protein acting downstream of RAS/MAPK pathway and is overexpressed in colon cancers. (a) NIH3T3 cells transfected with empty vector or plasmids encoding p65BTK, p77 or mutated H-RAS (H-RASV12). p65BTK expression was assessed by p65BTK-specific polyclonal antibody BN49, whereas p77BTK was probed with a monoclonal antibody against the N-term of BTK (BD). (b) Phase contrast images of NIH3T3 transfected with empty vector or plasmids expressing p77BTK, p65BTK, H-RASV12; × 40 magnification. To note, p77BTK-transfected NIH3T3 maintain the same appearance of the empty vector-transfected untransformed fibroblasts, whereas p65BTK-transfected NIH3T3 are similar to H-RASV12-transformed fibroblasts. (c) In soft agar assay, p65BTK-transfected NIH3T3 fibroblasts showed a colony-forming activity higher than H-RASV12-transfected ones (× 10 magnification). Right: number of colonies (mean of three separate wells). (d) Focus assay of NIH3T3 cells transfected with empty vector, H-RASV12, p65BTK or p77BTK expression plasmids, grown in the absence or presence of BTK (Ibrutinib), RAS (FTI-277) or MEK1/2 (CI-1040) inhibitors; parallel samples of p65BTK-transfected cells were treated for 16 days with CI1040 or treated for 10 days with CI1040 followed by 6 days without drug; (× 10 magnification). (e) Immunohistochemical detection of p65BTK, hnRNPK and p-ERK-1/2 in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens (× 40 magnification); tumour samples (T) showing predominant cytoplasmic hnRNPK expression and moderate to strong p-ERK-1/2 levels expressed the highest amounts of p65BTK, whereas low expression of p65BTK was detectable in peritumoural (PT) samples, in which hnRNPK was exclusively or predominantly nuclear and p-ERK-1/2 levels were very low. (f, g) Overexpression of p65BTK in patients with stage II colon cancer. Tissue microarray (TMA) analysis of p65BTK expression was performed in tumoural/peritumoural pairs of specimens from a cohort of 83 patients and results were grouped by comparing the expression in tumoural vs peritumoural tissues (f) and by the intensity of the staining in the tumour tissue (g).

Back to article page