Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Primary Care Respiratory Journal
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. primary care respiratory journal
  3. articles
  4. article
General Practitioners use of the Cochrane Library in London
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Published: December 2002

General Practitioners use of the Cochrane Library in London

  • Felix S F Ram1 &
  • Sheree R Wellington 

Primary Care Respiratory Journal volume 11, pages 123–124 (2002)Cite this article

  • 600 Accesses

  • 8 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Aim

To investigate the use of the Cochrane Library by general practitioners (GPs) in London.

Method

We conducted a postal questionnaire survey of general practices in South London. Two hundred and eighty-seven questionnaires were posted in December 2001 to all general practices in the South London region. All addresses beginning with either a SE or SW postcode were sent a two-page questionnaire with a covering letter.

Results

The response rate was 30%, with 33% of GPs having ever used the Cochrane Library and 67% that had not previously used the library. General practitioners that reported to have used the Cochrane Library used it only occasionally and found the library to be user friendly as well as being a useful source of information However, 52% of GPs had never heard or used the Cochrane Library, and most reported poor publicity, awareness and time constrains as the major reasons for their lack of use.

Conclusions

The Cochrane Library of systematic reviews is a considered a user-friendly and useful source of evidence-base information. However, the utilisation and uptake of the Cochrane Library by GPs in South London is poor. Further resources are required to improve utilisation and increase awareness of this important source of evidence in primary care.

You have full access to this article via your institution.

Download PDF

Similar content being viewed by others

Practicality of a patient self-assessment checklist to manage dementia risk factors in GP practices

Article Open access 16 May 2025

Unemployed individuals contact GPs more frequently but report lower satisfaction: results of the population-based DEGS1 and the GPCare-1 patient survey

Article Open access 23 April 2022

Understanding inherent influencing factors to digital health adoption in general practices through a mixed-methods analysis

Article Open access 27 February 2024

Article PDF

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cochrane Airways Group St. Georges Hospital Medical School Department of Physiological Medicine, Level 0, Jenner Wing Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London, SW17 0RE

    Felix S F Ram (Research Fellow in Respiratory Medicine)

Authors
  1. Felix S F Ram
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sheree R Wellington
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix S F Ram.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ram, F., Wellington, S. General Practitioners use of the Cochrane Library in London. Prim Care Respir J 11, 123–124 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/pcrj.2002.104

Download citation

  • Received: 27 May 2002

  • Accepted: 08 November 2002

  • Issue date: December 2002

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/pcrj.2002.104

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

  • The effectiveness of research implementation strategies for promoting evidence-informed policy and management decisions in healthcare: a systematic review

    • Mitchell N. Sarkies
    • Kelly-Ann Bowles
    • Terry P. Haines

    Implementation Science (2017)

  • Interventions Encouraging the Use of Systematic Reviews in Clinical Decision-Making: A Systematic Review

    • Laure Perrier
    • Kelly Mrklas
    • Sharon E. Straus

    Journal of General Internal Medicine (2011)

You have full access to this article via your institution.

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information

Publish with us

  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Primary Care Respiratory Journal (Prim Care Respir J)

ISSN 1475-1534 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing