Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Primary Care Respiratory Journal
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. primary care respiratory journal
  3. abstracts collections
  4. article
Validation of a single concentration inhalation provocation test (SCIPT) in children
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Abstracts Collection
  • Published: June 2002

Validation of a single concentration inhalation provocation test (SCIPT) in children

  • W.Hagmolen of ten Have1,
  • N.J. van den Berg1,
  • P.J.E. Bindels2,
  • J. van der Palen3 &
  • …
  • W.M.C. van Aalderen4 

Primary Care Respiratory Journal volume 11, page 59 (2002)Cite this article

  • 321 Accesses

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Background:

A new method to assess bronchial responsiveness (BR) using a single concentration methacholine has already been validated in adults with asthma1. Since the geometrical dimensions of the airways in children are different, and deposition of the inhaled aerosol also differs in children, results from studies in adults cannot simply be extrapolated to children.

Aim of the study:

validation of a single-concentration inhalation provocation method in children.

Methods:

Twenty-three subjects performed three methacholine inhalation challenge tests. The first two challenges according to method A: doubling doses, beginning with 0.03 mg to a maximum of 1.8 mg (maximal cumulated dose 3.6 mg), were administered with the Jeager Masterscope, Aerosol Provocation System (APS), medic aid sidestream nebulizer. The third challenge according method B: doubling doses, beginning with 0.002mg to a maximum of 1.8mg (maximal cumulated dose 3.5 mg), were administered with a Devillbiss 646 nebulizer. The degree of BR is expressed as a PD20. A difference of <1,5 dose step is assumed to be due to intra individual variation.

Results:

I.C.C. between method A and B is 0.80 and between both tests according method A 0.91. Comparing challenges 1 and 2, and 1 and 3 showed good agreement according to Bland and Altman.2

Conclusion:

This single concentration method is an accurate method of measuring BR in children.

Article PDF

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. department of paediatrics, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere

    W.Hagmolen of ten Have & N.J. van den Berg

  2. department of general practice, Academisch Medisch Centrum-University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam

    P.J.E. Bindels

  3. department of epidemiology, Medisch spectrum Twente, Enschede

    J. van der Palen

  4. department of paediatric pulmonology, Emma children hospital AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    W.M.C. van Aalderen

Authors
  1. W.Hagmolen of ten Have
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N.J. van den Berg
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P.J.E. Bindels
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. van der Palen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. W.M.C. van Aalderen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

of ten Have, W., van den Berg, N., Bindels, P. et al. Validation of a single concentration inhalation provocation test (SCIPT) in children. Prim Care Respir J 11, 59 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/pcrj.2002.35

Download citation

  • Issue date: June 2002

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/pcrj.2002.35

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information

Publish with us

  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Primary Care Respiratory Journal (Prim Care Respir J)

ISSN 1475-1534 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing