Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Primary Care Respiratory Journal
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. primary care respiratory journal
  3. articles
  4. article
Evaluation of an intervention to improve successful completion of the Mini-AQLQ: comparison of postal and supervised completion
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Published: March 2004

Evaluation of an intervention to improve successful completion of the Mini-AQLQ: comparison of postal and supervised completion

  • Hilary Pinnock1,
  • Aziz Sheikh2 &
  • Elizabeth F. Juniper3 

Primary Care Respiratory Journal volume 13, pages 36–41 (2004)Cite this article

  • 827 Accesses

  • 15 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Introduction:

Previous postal administration of Mini Asthma-related Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ) (validated for self-completion under supervision) resulted in 12.7% completion error rate.

Aims:

To administer the Mini-AQLQ by post with instructions, and to compare completion errors with our previous study and usable response rate with supervised self-completion.

Method:

The Mini-AQLQ, with an instruction sheet, was posted to 96 participants from UK general practice, for completion 1 week before supervised self-completion in the surgery.

Results:

94/96 (98%) postal questionnaires were returned: the error rate of 10.6% was similar to our previous study (postal versus previous: 10/94 versus 23/181: P = 0.62). 86/96 (90%) attended for supervised completion with no completion errors (supervised versus postal: 0/86 versus 10/94: P ≤ 0.01) Overall usable response rates were similar. (supervised versus postal: 86/96 versus 84/96, P = 0.65).

Conclusion:

Our instruction sheet did not significantly reduce postal completion errors, however the good postal return rate achieved comparable overall usable response rates to supervised administration.

You have full access to this article via your institution.

Download PDF

Similar content being viewed by others

JACQLQ subjective symptom questionnaire score and clinical test results for patients with allergic conjunctival disease

Article Open access 14 July 2024

The quality-adjusted life-years in the oncological patients’ health-related quality of life

Article Open access 09 August 2022

Venetoclax combinations delay the time to deterioration of HRQoL in unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Article Open access 20 April 2022

Article PDF

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Foresterhill Health Centre, University of Aberdeen, Westburn Road, Aberdeen, AB25 2AY, Scotland, UK

    Hilary Pinnock

  2. Division of Community Health Sciences, GP Section, University of Edinburgh, 20 West Richmond Street, Edinburgh, EH10 5PF, Scotland, UK

    Aziz Sheikh

  3. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

    Elizabeth F. Juniper

Authors
  1. Hilary Pinnock
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aziz Sheikh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elizabeth F. Juniper
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hilary Pinnock.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pinnock, H., Sheikh, A. & Juniper, E. Evaluation of an intervention to improve successful completion of the Mini-AQLQ: comparison of postal and supervised completion. Prim Care Respir J 13, 36–41 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcrj.2003.11.004

Download citation

  • Issue date: March 2004

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcrj.2003.11.004

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

You have full access to this article via your institution.

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information

Publish with us

  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Primary Care Respiratory Journal (Prim Care Respir J)

ISSN 1475-1534 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing