Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Primary Care Respiratory Journal
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. primary care respiratory journal
  3. perspectives
  4. article
Asthma management: Are GINA guidelines appropriate for daily clinical practice?
Download PDF
  • Perspective
  • Published: December 2005

Asthma management: Are GINA guidelines appropriate for daily clinical practice?

  • Barbara P. Yawn1,2,
  • Thys van der Molen3,4 &
  • Marc Humbert5 

Primary Care Respiratory Journal volume 14, pages 294–302 (2005)Cite this article

  • 1113 Accesses

  • 12 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

An international group of primary care asthma experts, as well as pulmonologists and allergists from Europe and the US, met to discuss asthma management focused on the primary care office. This paper summarizes their discussions. Accuracy of diagnosis and appropriateness of treatment is variable depending on the clinical circumstances and patient group. The value of classifying patients based on baseline or static asthma severity scores remains controversial, and asthma management decisions based on symptom control appear to have greater practical utility in a primary care setting. Furthermore, it must be recognized that patients, caregivers and physicians may have differing, and possibly conflicting, goals for therapy. There are many initiatives to improve the quality of asthma management, for example, primary care-focused guidelines being developed by the International Primary Care Respiratory Group, and several groups are working on asthma control scores. In addition, new therapies may improve the options available for increasing compliance and reducing side effects. In conclusion, asthma management should be patient-focused, with outcomes relevant to improving the quality of life for people with asthma.

You have full access to this article via your institution.

Download PDF

Similar content being viewed by others

Implementation of a primary care asthma management quality improvement programme across 68 general practice sites

Article Open access 13 May 2023

Best practice advice for asthma exacerbation prevention and management in primary care: an international expert consensus

Article Open access 17 November 2024

Asthma control among treated US asthma patients in Practice Fusion’s electronic medical record research database

Article Open access 27 April 2023

Article PDF

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Research, Olmsted Medical Center, Rochester, MN, USA

    Barbara P. Yawn

  2. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    Barbara P. Yawn

  3. Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland

    Thys van der Molen

  4. Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Scotland d Department of General Practice, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Thys van der Molen

  5. Service de Pneumologie et Réanimation Respiratoire, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Sud, Clamart, France

    Marc Humbert

Authors
  1. Barbara P. Yawn
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thys van der Molen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marc Humbert
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara P. Yawn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yawn, B., van der Molen, T. & Humbert, M. Asthma management: Are GINA guidelines appropriate for daily clinical practice?. Prim Care Respir J 14, 294–302 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcrj.2005.04.004

Download citation

  • Received: 05 February 2005

  • Accepted: 18 April 2005

  • Issue date: December 2005

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcrj.2005.04.004

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

  • Leitlinie zur Behandlung des Asthma bronchiale bei Kindern und Jugendlichen

    • Josef Riedler
    • Ernst Eber
    • Maximilian Zach

    Wiener klinische Wochenschrift (2008)

  • Leitlinie zur Behandlung des Asthma bronchiale bei Kindern und Jugendlichen

    Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde (2008)

You have full access to this article via your institution.

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information

Publish with us

  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Primary Care Respiratory Journal (Prim Care Respir J)

ISSN 1475-1534 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing