Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Primary Care Respiratory Journal
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. primary care respiratory journal
  3. articles
  4. article
COPD screening efforts in primary care: what is the yield?
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Published: 01 February 2007

COPD screening efforts in primary care: what is the yield?

  • David G Tinkelman1,
  • David B Price2,
  • Robert J Nordyke3 &
  • …
  • Ronald J Halbert1 

Primary Care Respiratory Journal volume 16, pages 41–48 (2007)Cite this article

  • 2841 Accesses

  • 87 Citations

  • 22 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Introduction:

Underdiagnosis of COPD appears to be common, although the degree of underdiagnosis is rarely measured. To document the extent of underdiagnosis in a high risk group of ambulatory patients, we performed spirometry in smokers aged 40 years and over drawn from general practices in two countries.

Methods:

Subjects were recruited from primary care practices in Aberdeen, Scotland, and Denver, Colorado, via random mailing. Current and former smokers aged 40 or older with no prior diagnosis of chronic obstructive respiratory disease (and no respiratory medications within the past year) were enrolled. Participants underwent pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry. A study diagnosis of COPD was defined as post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.70.

Results:

Spirometric examination was complete in 818 patients, of whom 155 (18.9%) had a study diagnosis of COPD. Using the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) severity criteria, the COPD was mild in 57.4%, moderate in 36.8%, and severe in 5.8%. No patients had very severe disease according to GOLD criteria.

Discussion:

Screening of smokers over 40 in general practice may yield 10 — 20% undiagnosed COPD cases, with a substantial proportion of these having moderate to severe disease. Earlier diagnosis through targeted case-finding will allow early, aggressive smoking cessation efforts and may lead to a reduction in the burden of COPD symptoms and a reduced impact of the disease on health-related quality of life in these patients.

You have full access to this article via your institution.

Download PDF

Similar content being viewed by others

Underestimation of respiratory symptoms by smokers: a thorn in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosis

Article Open access 12 March 2021

Diagnostic spirometry in COPD is increasing, a comparison of two Swedish cohorts

Article Open access 02 June 2023

Most patients with COPD are unaware of their health threats and are not diagnosed: a national-level study using pulmonary function test

Article Open access 11 April 2023

Article PDF

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Health Initiatives, National Jewish Medical and Research Center, Denver, USA

    David G Tinkelman & Ronald J Halbert

  2. Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK

    David B Price

  3. UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Robert J Nordyke

Authors
  1. David G Tinkelman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David B Price
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert J Nordyke
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ronald J Halbert
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald J Halbert.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

DGT is an employee of the National Jewish Medical and Research Center which received funding from Boehringer Ingelheim to participate in this study.

DBP has received honoraria for speaking at sponsored meetings and serving on advisory panels for the following companies marketing COPD products: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Pfizer. He or his research team have received funding for research projects from the following companies marketing COPD products: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Pfizer.

At the time this study was performed, RJN and RJH were employees of Protocare Sciences which provided consulting services to the pharmaceutical industry, including the sponsors of this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tinkelman, D., Price, D., Nordyke, R. et al. COPD screening efforts in primary care: what is the yield?. Prim Care Respir J 16, 41–48 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3132/pcrj.2007.00009

Download citation

  • Received: 30 March 2006

  • Accepted: 13 November 2006

  • Published: 01 February 2007

  • Issue date: February 2007

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3132/pcrj.2007.00009

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

  • Accuracy of the COPD diagnostic questionnaire as a screening tool in primary care

    • Lisa Pagano
    • Zoe McKeough
    • Sarah Dennis

    BMC Primary Care (2022)

  • Identifying airway obstruction in primary care: is there a role for physiotherapists?

    • Lisa Pagano
    • Sarah Dennis
    • Zoe McKeough

    BMC Primary Care (2022)

  • A scoring system to detect fixed airflow limitation in smokers from simple easy-to-use parameters

    • Esther Román-Conejos
    • Antonio Palazón-Bru
    • Ernesto Cortés-Castell

    Scientific Reports (2018)

  • GP utilisation by education level among adults with COPD or asthma: a cross-sectional register-based study

    • Øystein Hetlevik
    • Hasse Melbye
    • Sturla Gjesdal

    npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine (2016)

  • Identifying cases of undiagnosed, clinically significant COPD in primary care: qualitative insight from patients in the target population

    • Nancy K Leidy
    • Katherine Kim
    • Fernando Martinez

    npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine (2015)

You have full access to this article via your institution.

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information

Publish with us

  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Primary Care Respiratory Journal (Prim Care Respir J)

ISSN 1475-1534 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing