Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Primary Care Respiratory Journal
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. primary care respiratory journal
  3. articles
  4. article
Management of spontaneous pneumothorax compared to British Thoracic Society (BTS) 2003 guidelines: a district general hospital audit
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Published: 12 October 2007

Management of spontaneous pneumothorax compared to British Thoracic Society (BTS) 2003 guidelines: a district general hospital audit

  • Andrew RL Medford1 &
  • Justin CT Pepperell1 

Primary Care Respiratory Journal volume 16, pages 291–298 (2007)Cite this article

  • 1191 Accesses

  • 11 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Background:

In 1993, the British Thoracic Society (BTS) issued guidelines for the management of spontaneous pneumothorax (SP). These were refined in 2003.

Aim:

To determine adherence to the 2003 BTS SP guidelines in a district general hospital.

Methods:

An initial retrospective audit of 52 episodes of acute SP was performed. Subsequent intervention involved a junior doctor educational update on both the 2003 BTS guidelines and the initial audit results, and the setting up of an online guideline hyperlink. After the educational intervention a further prospective re-audit of 28 SP episodes was performed.

Results:

Management of SP deviated considerably from the 2003 BTS guidelines in the initial audit — deviation rate 26.9%. After the intervention, a number of clinical management deviations persisted (32.1% deviation rate); these included failure to insert a chest drain despite unsuccessful aspiration, and attempting aspiration of symptomatic secondary SPs.

Conclusion:

Specific tools to improve standards might include a pneumothorax proforma to improve record keeping and a pneumothorax care pathway to reduce management deviations compared to BTS guidelines. Successful change also requires identification of the total target audience for any educational intervention.

You have full access to this article via your institution.

Download PDF

Similar content being viewed by others

Recommendation for management of patients with their first episode of primary spontaneous pneumothorax, using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or conservative treatment

Article Open access 25 May 2021

Trends in recurrence of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in young population after treatment for first episode based on a nationwide population data

Article Open access 18 August 2023

Changes in respiratory mechanics of artificial pneumothorax two-lung ventilation in video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone position

Article Open access 26 March 2021

Article PDF

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Taunton and Somerset NHS Trust, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, TA1 5DA, Somerset, UK

    Andrew RL Medford & Justin CT Pepperell

Authors
  1. Andrew RL Medford
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Justin CT Pepperell
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew RL Medford.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Medford, A., Pepperell, J. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax compared to British Thoracic Society (BTS) 2003 guidelines: a district general hospital audit. Prim Care Respir J 16, 291–298 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3132/pcrj.2007.00060

Download citation

  • Received: 15 February 2007

  • Accepted: 21 June 2007

  • Published: 12 October 2007

  • Issue date: October 2007

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3132/pcrj.2007.00060

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

You have full access to this article via your institution.

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information

Publish with us

  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Primary Care Respiratory Journal (Prim Care Respir J)

ISSN 1475-1534 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing