Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Primary Care Respiratory Journal
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. primary care respiratory journal
  3. articles
  4. article
The 2010 NICE COPD Guidelines: how do they compare with the GOLD guidelines?
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Published: 24 March 2011

The 2010 NICE COPD Guidelines: how do they compare with the GOLD guidelines?

  • Kevin Gruffydd-Jones1,2 &
  • Chris Loveridge3,4 

Primary Care Respiratory Journal volume 20, pages 199–204 (2011)Cite this article

  • 4384 Accesses

  • 36 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Abstract

The UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has produced a 2010 partial update of its original 2004 Guidelines on COPD management. The definition of airflow obstruction has been altered to a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio < 0.7 and the severity of airflow obstruction has been similarly aligned with the Global initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guideline definition. However, patients with GOLD Stage 1 (i.e. FEV1 predicted > 80%) must be symptomatic for a diagnosis of COPD to be made under the new NICE criteria. Recent large scale trials have resulted in a new inhaled pharmacotherapy algorithm which includes early use of inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist combination therapy for patients with an FEV1 < 50% predicted. In spite of an apparent emphasis on pharmacotherapy, both GOLD and NICE Guidelines emphasise that COPD is a multi-system disease requiring a multidimensional approach to treatment. In particular, the importance of smoking cessation and pulmonary rehabilitation is reiterated, the latter not only being of use in managing stable disease but also following hospital discharge.

You have full access to this article via your institution.

Download PDF

Similar content being viewed by others

Mortality and exacerbation risk according to GOLD and STAR severity stages of COPD: a 5-year multicenter prospective cohort study

Article Open access 30 May 2025

Pharmaceutical treatment status of patients with COPD in the community based on medical Internet of Things: a real-world study

Article Open access 10 May 2024

Investigating the rationale for COPD maintenance therapy prescription across Europe, findings from a multi-country study

Article Open access 03 May 2023

Article PDF

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. General Practitioner, Box Surgery, Box, Wiltshire, UK

    Kevin Gruffydd-Jones

  2. Member of the NICE COPD Guidelines Development Group,

    Kevin Gruffydd-Jones

  3. Specialist Nurse, Education For Health, Warwick, UK

    Chris Loveridge

  4. Member of the NICE COPD Guidelines Development Group,

    Chris Loveridge

Authors
  1. Kevin Gruffydd-Jones
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chris Loveridge
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Gruffydd-Jones.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

KGJ has acted as a consultant for and spoken at meetings sponsored by AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Napp, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Boehringer Ingelheim and Chiesi

CL has spoken at meetings sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim/Pfizer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gruffydd-Jones, K., Loveridge, C. The 2010 NICE COPD Guidelines: how do they compare with the GOLD guidelines?. Prim Care Respir J 20, 199–204 (2011). https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2011.00011

Download citation

  • Received: 05 July 2010

  • Revised: 21 November 2010

  • Accepted: 22 December 2010

  • Published: 24 March 2011

  • Issue date: June 2011

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2011.00011

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

  • First Maintenance Therapy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Retrospective Analyses of US and UK Healthcare Databases

    • Chloe I. Bloom
    • Jukka Montonen
    • Surya P. Bhatt

    Pulmonary Therapy (2022)

  • Indoor air pollution and its association with poor lung function, microalbuminuria and variations in blood pressure among kitchen workers in India: a cross-sectional study

    • Amarnath Singh
    • Chandrasekharan Nair Kesavachandran
    • Altaf Hussain Khan

    Environmental Health (2017)

  • Changes in initial COPD treatment choice over time and factors influencing prescribing decisions in UK primary care: a real-world study

    • Kevin Gruffydd-Jones
    • Guy Brusselle
    • David Price

    npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine (2016)

  • Identifying cases of undiagnosed, clinically significant COPD in primary care: qualitative insight from patients in the target population

    • Nancy K Leidy
    • Katherine Kim
    • Fernando Martinez

    npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine (2015)

You have full access to this article via your institution.

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information

Publish with us

  • Language editing services
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Primary Care Respiratory Journal (Prim Care Respir J)

ISSN 1475-1534 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing