Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letters to Editor
  • Published:

Decay of Marine Magnetic Anomalies by Ferrous Ion Diffusion

Abstract

THE linear marine magnetic anomalies are well understood in terms of the hypothesis of Vine and Matthews1 of normal and reversely magnetized dykes on the seafloor. But it is curious that their amplitudes decay as a function of lateral distance from the middle of the mid-oceanic ridge. This requires the central anomaly to be due to a dyke whose intensity of magnetization, M, has sometimes to be taken as twice that of the dykes on either side2. Matthews and Bath3 suggested that the dykes causing the central anomaly are not injected exactly at the centre of the ridge, but with a finite standard deviation. Normally magnetized dykes 200 m wide with a standard deviation of 5 km were thus shown to contaminate the reversely magnetized flanking dykes, causing the variation in anomalies as a function of lateral distance. But Harrison4 has shown that such large deviations are unacceptable because they would obliterate the sharp magnetic events, such as the Olduvai event. Harrison concluded that the explanation has to be in terms of a stronger dipole magnetic moment of the Earth in recent times, as against the past and/or a recent secular decay of the frozen natural remanent magnetization (NRM) of the dykes. As supporting proof of the first hypothesis, Harrison quoted palaeointensity work5–7 on rocks and archaeological samples. But, as Stacey8 has pointed out, a secular intrinsic decay of NRM in these samples would appear to lend weight to the hypothesis that the Earth's magnetic field was stronger in the past than now. Harrison's alternative suggestion was a secular decay of NRM because of the demagnetizing action of the past reversals of the Earth's magnetic field. The effect would be somewhat similar to that of demagnetization by a slowly alternating weak magnetic field. But the efficiency of such a demagnetization process would be no different from that of the viscous magnetization acquired at room temperature in the Earth's field, and that has been shown to be unimportant by Nagata9.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

References

  1. Vine, F. J., and Matthews, D. H., Nature, 199, 947 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vine, F. J., Science, 154, 1405 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Matthews, D. H., and Bath, J., Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc., 13, 349 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Harrison, C. G. A., J. Geophys. Res., 73, 2137 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bucha, V., Nature, 213, 1005 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Coe, R. S., J. Geophys. Res., 72, 3247 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cox, A., and Dalrymple, G. B., J. Geophys. Res., 72, 2603 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stacey, F. D., Physics of the Earth, 191 (Wiley, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nagata, T., Rockmagnetism, 258 (Plenum, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lowrie, W., and Fuller, M., Phil. Mag., 18, 589 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Haggerty, S. E., and Irving, E., Eos Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 51, 273 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Watkins, N. D., Paster, T., and Ade-Hall, J., Eos Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 51, 273 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Creer, K. M., Ibbetson, J., and Drew, W., Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc., 19, 93 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stacey, F. D., Adv. Phys., 12, 45 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Braginski, A., and Merceron, T., J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 17, 1611 (1962).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Godby, E. A., Hood, P. J., and Bower, M. E., J. Geophys. Res., 73, 7637 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Iida, S., J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 17, 123 (1962).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Slonczewski, J. C., Magnetism, 1, 222 (Academic Press, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bickford, L. R., Brownlow, J. M., and Penoyer, R. F., J. Appl. Phys., 29, 441 (1958).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Banerjee, S. K., O'Reilly, W., Gibb, T. C., and Greenwood, N. N., J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 28, 1323 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Einwich, A. M., Higgs, R. H., and Lowry, H. M., Eos Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 51, 274 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BANERJEE, S. Decay of Marine Magnetic Anomalies by Ferrous Ion Diffusion. Nature Physical Science 229, 181–183 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1038/physci229181b0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/physci229181b0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing