Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letters to Editor
  • Published:

New Grain Size Limits for Palaeomagnetic Stability in Haematite

Abstract

HAEMATITE (α−Fe2O3) is an important carrier of natural remanence magnetization (NRM) in sedimentary rocks (such as red sandstones and shales, oceanic red clays) as well as in some volcanic rocks (such as highly oxidized basalts, ignim-brites), and monomineralic rocks (cassiterite, for example). To be useful to the palaeomagnetist, however, such haematite particles should preserve the integrity of the intensity and direction of their NRM over geological time-scales. One of the primary requirements, therefore, is that the grain size should fall between two size thresholds; the lower of these two is the superparamagnetic threshold (ds.p.) and the higher size corresponds to the multi-domain threshold (dm.p.). The importance of the superparamagnetic threshold in palaeomagnetism was illustrated by Creer1 in his study of the Keuper marl. He showed that the principal reason for the instability of NRM in this red rock was due to the haematite grains being smaller than ds.p. ; thus the thermal energy, kT, at room temperature was larger than the stabilizing magnetic anisotropy energy, vK, where volume v=πd3/6 and anisotropy energy per unit volume = K. Creer studied2 the variation of magnetization with grain size using synthetic haematite derived from dehydrated goethite. One concludes from his data that ds.p.,the superparamagnetic threshold in haematite, is less than 100 Å since even at d=100 Å, haematite exhibited field-dependent susceptibility. Strangway et al.3 used dehydrated natural goethite to establish the value of ds.p., and found it to be 5000 Å, vastly different from the value of <100 Å, concluded by us from Creer's work2. Kündig et al.4 prepared synthetic haematite in commercially available silica gel matrix and studied the onset of superparamagnetism using Mössbauer effect. Since these samples are not likely to be contaminated by goethite (goethite, in spite of being an antiferromagnetic compound, can possess weak ferromagnetism due to internal defects)3,5, the Möss-bauer-derived ds.p. of 150 Å ought to be more reliable. Kündig's preparation technique was to soak silica gel samples with an inorganic iron salt solution and then heat the samples to prepare the haematite grains. This process leads to “clumping” and a large distribution of grain sizes, and Dunlop (in the press) has pointed out the fact that Mössbauer effect measurements lead to the determination of the product (vK)s.p. and not vs.p. uniquely. Thus one should regard the Mössbauer derived ds.p. of 150 Å as tentative, until purely magnetic measurements can establish uniquely the superparamagnetic threshold. In what follows we present a new ds.p. value using magnetic measurements on synthetic haematite particles, prepared by a modification of the technique of Kündig et al. leading to a much narrower size distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

References

  1. Creer, K. M., Geophys. J., 5, 16 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Creer, K. M., J. Geomag. Geoelect., 13, 86 (1962).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Strangway, D. W., Honea, R. M., McMahon, B. E., and Larson, E. E., Geophys. J., 15, 345 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kündig, W., et al., Phys. Rev., 142, 327 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Banerjee, S. K., Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 8, 197 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chevallier, R., and Mathieu, S., Ann. Phys., 18, 258 (1943).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Banerjee, S. K., and Morgan, P. E. D., Eos-Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 51, 276 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Banerjee, S. K., Phil. Mag., 8, 2119 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Flanders, P. J., and Schuele, W. J., Phil. Mag., 8, 485 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stacey, F. D., Adv. Phys., 12, 45 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schroeer, D., and Nininger, R. C., Phys. Rev. Lett., 19, 632 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BANERJEE, S. New Grain Size Limits for Palaeomagnetic Stability in Haematite. Nature Physical Science 232, 15–16 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1038/physci232015a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/physci232015a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing