Abstract
Background: The inclusion of parents in the difficult decision-making inherent in prenatal counseling for infants at the margin of viability is internationally debated. However, there is little information on how much parental decision-making is incorporated into these conversations. This survey explores the extent of parental involvement in prenatal consults in two countries.
Objective: To compare prenatal consultation attitudes and practices toward parental decision-making of New England (NE), USA and Swedish neonatologists for a hypothetical case of an infant at the margin of viability (23.5–24.5 weeks gestation, imminent delivery).
Methods: An anonymous, self-administered survey was developed and distributed in English to all practicing neonatologists in 6 New England states and the country of Sweden (S).
Results: For the New England portion, 148/175 surveys were completed (response rate 85%). For the Swedish portion, 88/128 surveys were completed (response rate 69%). Compared to their US counterparts, Swedish neonatologists less frequently report the belief that parents should be involved in making resuscitations decisions (NE 77% v S 26%, p<.0001). The practice of actually including the parents in the final decision regarding resuscitation is also reported less frequently in Sweden than in New England (NE 41% v S 10%, p<.0001). When asked to rank their most important role as a neonatologist, both countries ranked the provision of factual data first (NE 58% v S 55%). In Sweden communicating that resuscitation decisions will be made in the delivery room was more frequently ranked second (NE 28% v S 62%, p<.0001), while in New England assisting parents in weighing the risks and benefits of treatment options was more frequently ranked second (NE 56% v S 16%, p<.0001). New England and Swedish neonatologists report similar rates of asking about prior experiences with death and dying (NE 70% v S 68%) and prior experiences with premature or handicapped children (NE 91% v S 87%). However, different rates are reported when asking about parental interpretation of good quality of life (NE 73% v S 55%, p<.06) and desired parental role in the decision-making process (NE 89% v S 69%, p<.0001)
Conclusion: Neonatologists in the US and Sweden report differences in the amount of parental input they seek in making decisions regarding resuscitation of infants at the border of viability.
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bastek, T., Burns, J., Zupancic, J. et al. 21 Parental Involvement in Prenatal Counseling for Infants at The Margin of Viability: An International Comparison. Pediatr Res 56, 467 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-200409000-00044
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-200409000-00044
