Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Variant sub-tiering, disease-gene associations and strictness of clinical criteria improves the interpretation of variants of uncertain significance in hereditary cardiomyopathies and rhythm disorders

Abstract

Besides the ClinGen’s efforts to standardize the ACMG/AMP criteria and European initiatives aimed at monitoring quality standards, molecular diagnostics of hereditary cardiomyopathies and heart rhythm disorders (HCHRDs) remains strongly influenced by the local strategies developed to overcome the variables in which genetic testing is requested. This is a monocentric study on the clinical and molecular findings of 363 pedigrees with various HCHRDs. ACMG/AMP criteria were adapted according to the ClinGen’s material and internal specifications. Phenotypes were reviewed according to known disease-gene associations and the concurrence of multiple variants in the same individual. Relatives were studied when available and the significance of selected variants was supported by RNA- studies before reporting. One or more (likely) pathogenic variants were found in 80 pedigrees (22.0%), while 96 (26.4%) displayed one or more variants of uncertain significance (VUS) only. The 132 identified VUS were sub-tiered according to the Bayesian score in three categories presenting distinguishable patterns of selected criteria. VUS_high showed profiles of key molecular criteria and resembled deleterious variants according to the combinations of assigned criteria, while the VUS_low category displayed a high chance of conflicting combinations of criteria and unsupported disease-gene associations. Reclassification to likely pathogenic by the application of applicable clinical criteria (PVS1_Strength, PP1 and PP4) was accessible to VUS_high and a few VUS_mid only. This work supports the combined need to (i) introduce VUS sub-tiering, (ii) consider known disease-gene associations, (iii) stringently apply clinical criteria and (iv) incorporate RNA data to improve the clinical significance of genetic testing in HCHRDs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Ommen SR, Mital S, Burke MA, Day SM, Deswal A, Elliott P, et al. 2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2020;142:e533–e57. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000938.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Arbustini E, Behr ER, Carrier L, van Duijn C, Evans P, Favalli V, et al. Interpretation and actionability of genetic variants in cardiomyopathies: a position statement from the European Society of Cardiology Council on cardiovascular genomics. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:1901–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab895.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kelly MA, Caleshu C, Morales A, Buchan J, Wolf Z, Harrison SM, et al. Adaptation and validation of the ACMG/AMP variant classification framework for MYH7-associated inherited cardiomyopathies: recommendations by ClinGen’s Inherited Cardiomyopathy Expert Panel. Genet Med. 2018;20:351–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.218.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ingles J, Goldstein J, Thaxton C, Caleshu C, Corty EW, Crowley SB, et al. Evaluating the clinical validity of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy genes. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2019;12:e002460. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCGEN.119.002460.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. James CA, Jongbloed JDH, Hershberger RE, Morales A, Judge DP, Syrris P, et al. International evidence based reappraisal of genes associated with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy using the clinical genome resource framework. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2021;14:e003273. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCGEN.120.003273.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Jordan E, Peterson L, Ai T, Asatryan B, Bronicki L, Brown E, et al. Evidence-based assessment of genes in dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2021;144:7–19. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.053033.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hayesmoore JB, Bhuiyan ZA, Coviello DA, du Sart D, Edwards M, Iascone M, et al. EMQN: Recommendations for genetic testing in inherited cardiomyopathies and arrhythmias. Eur J Hum Genet. 2023;31:1003–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-023-01421-w.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lopes LR, Ho CY, Elliott PM. Genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: established and emerging implications for clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2024;45:2727–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae421.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Porretta AP, Probst V, Bhuiyan ZA, Davoine E, Deliniere A, Pascale P, et al. SCN5A overlap syndromes: An open-minded approach. Heart Rhythm. 2022;19:1363–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.03.1223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kolokotronis K, Kuhnisch J, Klopocki E, Dartsch J, Rost S, Huculak C, et al. Biallelic mutation in MYH7 and MYBPC3 leads to severe cardiomyopathy with left ventricular noncompaction phenotype. Hum Mutat. 2019;40:1101–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.23757.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosario KF, Karra R, Amos K, Landstrom AP, Lakdawala NK, Brezitski K, et al. LMNA cardiomyopathy: important considerations for the heart failure clinician. J Card Fail. 2023;29:1657–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.08.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu T, Yang Z, Vatta M, Rampazzo A, Beffagna G, Pilichou K, et al. Compound and digenic heterozygosity contributes to arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:587–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Tavtigian SV, Greenblatt MS, Harrison SM, Nussbaum RL, Prabhu SA, Boucher KM, et al. Modeling the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines as a Bayesian classification framework. Genet Med. 2018;20:1054–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Josephs KS, Roberts AM, Theotokis P, Walsh R, Ostrowski PJ, Edwards M, et al. Beyond gene-disease validity: capturing structured data on inheritance, allelic requirement, disease-relevant variant classes, and disease mechanism for inherited cardiac conditions. Genome Med. 2023;15:86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-023-01246-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Olivotto I, Girolami F, Ackerman MJ, Nistri S, Bos JM, Zachara E, et al. Myofilament protein gene mutation screening and outcome of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83:630–8. https://doi.org/10.4065/83.6.630.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Page SP, Kounas S, Syrris P, Christiansen M, Frank-Hansen R, Andersen PS, et al. Cardiac myosin binding protein-C mutations in families with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: disease expression in relation to age, gender, and long term outcome. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2012;5:156–66. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.111.960831.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Roberts AM, DiStefano MT, Riggs ER, Josephs KS, Alkuraya FS, Amberger J, et al. Toward robust clinical genome interpretation: Developing a consistent terminology to characterize Mendelian disease-gene relationships-allelic requirement, inheritance modes, and disease mechanisms. Genet Med. 2024;26:101029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2023.101029.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller DT, Lee K, Abul-Husn NS, Amendola LM, Brothers K, Chung WK, et al. ACMG SF v3.2 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: A policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2023;25:100866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2023.100866.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Houge G, Laner A, Cirak S, de Leeuw N, Scheffer H, den Dunnen JT. Stepwise ABC system for classification of any type of genetic variant. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022;30:150–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-00903-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rehm HL, Alaimo JT, Aradhya S, Bayrak-Toydemir P, Best H, Brandon R, et al. The landscape of reported VUS in multi-gene panel and genomic testing: Time for a change. Genet Med. 2023;25:100947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2023.100947.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen E, Facio FM, Aradhya KW, Rojahn S, Hatchell KE, Aguilar S, et al. Rates and classification of variants of uncertain significance in hereditary disease genetic testing. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6:e2339571 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.39571.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the participants who donated valuable samples and data to allow this study.

Funding

This work was funded by the Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Corrente 2022-2024 and PNRR-MCNT2-2023-12377305 “EUCARDIS”) to MC, and by Fondazione Telethon Core Grant, Armenise-Harvard Foundation Career Development Award, European Research Council (grant agreement 759154, CellKarma), Italian Ministry of Health (Piano Operativo Salute Traiettoria 3, “Genomed”; Ricerca Finalizzata 2021, “genOMICA”; PNRR-MCNT2-2023-12377305 “EUCARDIS”) and Italian Ministry of University and Research (Progetti di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale 2022) to DC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization M.C., S.M., G.D., S.M., C.F.; methodology G.N., A.F., M.C., C.F., E.D., P.P., M.P.L,; validation G.N.,C.F., R.P., O.P., M.C., D.C.; clinical evaluation A.P., D.R.P., M.C., G.D.L., C.C., R.S.M., R.D.S., L.V.; writing—original draft preparation M.C.,S.M., G.D., F.C.; supervision M.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Castori.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Davide Cacchiarelli is founder, shareholder, and consultant of NEGEDIA S.r.l. All the other authors declare that there is no conflict of interest concerning this work.

Ethics approval

This study is in accordance with the 1984 Helsinki declaration and subsequent revisions, and received IRB approval by the local ethics committee ‘Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico Foggia’ (approval no. 89/CE/2024).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Castori, M., Mastroianno, S., Fontana, A. et al. Variant sub-tiering, disease-gene associations and strictness of clinical criteria improves the interpretation of variants of uncertain significance in hereditary cardiomyopathies and rhythm disorders. J Hum Genet 70, 349–358 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-025-01344-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-025-01344-y

Search

Quick links