Table 1 The table shows the pro and cons of osteogenic cells derived from different sources

From: Direct conversion of fibroblasts to osteoblasts as a novel strategy for bone regeneration in elderly individuals

The method of bone repair

 

Pros

Cons

Ref.

Transplantation

Autograft

No tissue rejection

Donor site morbidity

 

Lower infection rate

Limited availability

 

Lower cost

Graft resorption

46

Allograft

No zoonosis

Immunological rejection

47

High expense

48

High morbidity

 

Xenograft

Mass production

Disease transmission

 

Biomaterials

 

Biodegradable materials

Toxic reaction

51

Biocompatibility

Difficulty in handling

52

Bone marrow- derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs)

 

Self-renewal differentiation ability of various cell types

Limited source of tissue

55

56

57

58

Induced Pluripotent Stem cell (iPSCs)

 

High proliferation

Require many steps to manufacture

64

Low immune rejection

Risk of teratoma formation

65,66

Direct conversion

 

Low risk of mutation

Lack of targeted cell types

77

Generation of specific cell type low immune rejection

Low efficiency aged reprogrammed cells

78