Fig. 18

Visual comparison on Places2. The SGRGAN method has also shown its applicability to inpainting modern naturally damaged images, exhibiting considerable effectiveness in achieving satisfactory inpainting results. (a) shows the input image of 30–45% of the nature image damage, the restored result of the SGRGAN, and the original real image. (b) and (c) only input images have different damage degrees: (b) has 15–30% damage, while (c) has 0–15% damage