Table 9 Error calculation of revised virtual restoration model of inscriptions
From: A high precision virtual restoration method for stone setting exemplified by Lingfeng Stone
Inscription No. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Side length | AB | AC | AB | AC | AB | AC | AB | AC | AB | AC |
True value(mm) | 793.26 | 407.17 | 737.62 | 928.93 | 321.99 | 541.72 | 467.45 | 505.10 | 774.72 | 642.38 |
Measured value(mm) | 792.46 | 419.25 | 759.12 | 918.72 | 332.00 | 517.00 | 462.61 | 486.67 | 734.42 | 644.50 |
Relative error | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.03 | -0.01 | 0.03 | -0.05 | -0.01 | -0.04 | -0.05 | 0.00 |
Inscription No. | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |||||
Side length | AB | AC | AB | AC | AB | AC | AB | AC | AB | AC |
True value(mm) | 452.30 | 468.27 | 404.28 | 1039.04 | 834.82 | 629.25 | 1063.47 | 555.20 | 606.61 | 683.78 |
Measured value(mm) | 433.10 | 453.00 | 395.12 | 1049.28 | 802.40 | 605.00 | 1069.00 | 548.00 | 600.00 | 680.00 |
Relative error | −0.04 | −0.03 | 0.02 | 0.01 | −0.04 | −0.04 | 0.01 | −0.01 | −0.01 | −0.01 |
