Table 4 Statistical analysis of the relationship between ancient site distribution and DEM
DEM(m) | Shangshan | Kuahuqiao | Hemudu | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number | Proportion | Number | Proportion | Number | Proportion | |
0 ~ 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 25.00% | 29 | 58.00% |
10 ~ 50 | 4 | 19.05% | 2 | 25.00% | 13 | 26.00% |
50 ~ 100 | 11 | 52.38% | 3 | 37.50% | 4 | 8.00% |
200 ~ 10 | 5 | 23.81% | 1 | 12.50% | 2 | 4.00% |
10 ~ 500 | 1 | 4.76% | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.00% |
DEM(m) | Majiabang | Songze | Liangzhu | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number | Proportion | Number | Proportion | Number | Proportion | |
0 ~ 10 | 42 | 77.78% | 44 | 84.62% | 238 | 76.53% |
10 ~ 50 | 11 | 20.37% | 7 | 13.46% | 56 | 18.01% |
50 ~ 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 4.50% |
200 ~ 10 | 1 | 1.85% | 1 | 1.92% | 3 | 0.96% |
10 ~ 500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
DEM(m) | Qianshanyang | Guangfulin | Maqiao | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number | Proportion | Number | Proportion | Number | Proportion | |
0 ~ 10 | 2 | 33.33% | 3 | 100.00% | 39 | 81.25% |
10 ~ 50 | 3 | 50.00% | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10.42% |
50 ~ 100 | 1 | 16.67% | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.17% |
200 ~ 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2.08% |
10 ~ 500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2.08% |
