Table 1 Cardiac morphology and systolic function in 3-month-old offspring

From: Normalisation of circulating adiponectin levels in obese pregnant mice prevents cardiac dysfunction in adult offspring

 

Con/PBS

Ob/PBS

Ob/ADN

P(ANOVA)

Male offspring

n = 7

n = 7

n = 9

 

Left ventricle

 Anterior wall (diastole), mm

0.52 ± 0.01

0.51 ± 0.01

0.50 ± 0.01

0.34

 Anterior wall (systole), mm

0.73 ± 0.01

0.71 ± 0.01

0.71 ± 0.01

0.43

 Posterior wall (diastole), mm

0.52 ± 0.01

0.50 ± 0.01

0.50 ± 0.01

0.37

 Posterior wall (systole), mm

0.73 ± 0.01

0.71 ± 0.01

0.71 ± 0.01

0.31

 Internal volume (diastole), μl

57.3 ± 2.8

66.6 ± 3.1

64.1 ± 3.1

0.12

 Internal volume (systole), μl

21.9 ± 2.0

25.6 ± 2.4

23.1 ± 1.9

0.49

Ejection fraction (%)

62.2 ± 1.8

62.0 ± 1.8

64.3 ± 1.8

0.61

Fractional shortening (%)

33.0 ± 1.2

33.0 ± 1.2

34.7 ± 1.4

0.56

Heart rate, bpm

502 ± 14

504 ± 12

532 ± 11

0.15

Female offspring

n = 10

n = 6

n = 8

 

Left ventricle

 Anterior wall (diastole), mm

0.51 ± 0.01

0.49 ± 0.01

0.48 ± 0.01

0.26

 Anterior wall (systole), mm

0.71 ± 0.02

0.69 ± 0.01

0.69 ± 0.02

0.53

 Posterior wall (diastole), mm

0.50 ± 0.01

0.48 ± 0.01

0.48 ± 0.01

0.25

 Posterior wall (systole), mm

0.71 ± 0.01

0.69 ± 0.01

0.69 ± 0.02

0.45

 Internal volume (diastole), μl

50.3 ± 2.1a

62.6 ± 2.7b

55.6 ± 3.4ab

0.02

 Internal volume (systole), μl

18.8 ± 0.9

23.5 ± 2.3

19.7 ± 1.5

0.10

Ejection fraction (%)

62.6 ± 1.1

62.8 ± 2.1

64.6 ± 1.5

0.59

Fractional shortening (%)

33.1 ± 0.8

33.4 ± 1.4

34.6 ± 1.1

0.54

Heart rate, bpm

542 ± 13

521 ± 15

529 ± 6

0.44

  1. Mean ± SEM echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular morphology and systolic function and heart rate in 3-month-old offspring of control, PBS-infused pregnant mice and obese pregnant mice infused either with PBS or adiponectin from E14.5 to 18.5. Values in bold indicate significant overall effect of maternal treatment group by one-way ANOVA. Values with different superscripts, a or b, are significantly different from one another by pairwise post hoc comparison (P < 0.05, Holm–Sidak test)
  2. ADN adiponectin, ANOVA analysis of variance, Con control, Ob obese, PBS phosphate-buffered saline