Table. 3 Multiple linear regression analysis of the association between the four movement behavior profiles and obesity indicators among 807 workers

From: Movement behavior profiles and obesity: a latent profile analysis of 24-h time-use composition among Danish workers

Variables

Profile

β

95% CI

p-value

BMI (kg/m2)

Chimpanzees

Ref

  
 

Lions

1.0

0.1, 2.0

0.04

 

Koalas

0.8

−0.3, 1.9

0.15

 

Ants

0.4

−0.5, 1.3

0.39

 

Chimpanzees

Ref

  

WC (cm)

Lions

4.3

1.4, 7.2

<0.001

 

Koalas

3.1

0.1, 6.2

0.05

 

Ants

2.6

−0.2, 5.3

0.07

 

Chimpanzees

Ref

  

Fat (%)

Lions

2.0

0.6, 3.4

0.01

 

Koalas

2.0

0.4, 3.7

0.02

 

Ants

1.0

−0.4, 2.4

0.16

  1. Each model is adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, alcohol, poor dietary intake, and socioeconomic status; BMI body mass index, WC waist circumference, CI confidence interval; “Chimpanzees” was set as a reference; results in bold are significant at p < 0.05; β is the beta estimate that indicated estimated difference in obesity indicators between each animal profile and “Chimpanzees”
Back to article page