Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Resource utilization patterns using non-invasive ventilation in neonates with respiratory distress syndrome

Abstract

Objectives

To describe the frequency of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and endotracheal intubation use in neonates diagnosed with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS); to describe resources utilization (length of stay (LOS), charges, costs) among NIV and intubated RDS groups.

Study design

Retrospective study from the national Kid’s Inpatient Database of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, for the years 1997–2012. Propensity scoring and multivariate regression analysis used to describe differences.

Results

A total of 595,254 out of 42,912,090 cases were identified with RDS. There was an increase in NIV use from 6% in 1997 to 17% in 2012. After matching, patients receiving NIV only were associated with shorter LOS: (95%CI) 25 (25.3,25.7) vs. 35 (34.2,34.9) days, decreased costs: ($/1k) 46.1 (45.5,46.8) vs. 65.0 (64.1,66.0), decreased charges: 130.3 (128.6,132.1) vs. 192.1 (189.5,194.6) compared to intubated neonates.

Conclusion

There was a three-fold increase in NIV use within the 15-year study period. NIV use was associated with decreased LOS, charges and costs compared to intubated patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Vital Statistics Report 2013.

  2. March of Dimes. Peristats. Infant deaths by cause of death: United States 2013.

  3. Dahlem P, Van Aalderen WM, Hamaker ME, Dijkfraaf MG, Bos AP. Incidence and short-term outcome of acute lung injury in mechanically ventilated children. Eur Respir J. 2003;22:980–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Papile LA, Polin RA, Carlo WA, Tan R, Kumar P, Benitz W, et al. Committee on Fetus and Newborn; American Academy of Pediatrics. Respiratory support in preterm infants at birth. Pediatrics. 2014;133:171–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stevens TP, Harrington EW, Blennow M, Soll RF Early surfactant administration with brief ventilation vs. selective surfactant and continued mechanical ventilation for preterm infants with or at risk for respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 2007;4:CD003063.

  6. Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, Hallman M, Ozek E, Plavka R, et al. European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants. Neonatology. 2010;97:402–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Winter JP, de Vries MAG, Zimmermann LJI. Clinical practice: Noninvasive respiratory support in newborns. Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169:777–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-010-1159-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Salvo V, Lista G, Lupo E, Ricotti A, Zimmermann L, Gavilanes A, et al. Noninvasive Ventilation Strategies for Early Treatment of RDS in Preterm Infants: An RCT. Pediatrics. 2015;135:444–51. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-0895.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hatch L, Grubb PH, Lea AS, Walsh WF, Markham MH, Whitney GM, et al. Endotracheal Intubation in Neonates: A Prospective Study of Adverse Safety Events in 162 Infants. J Pediatr. 2016;168:62–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Berger J, Mehta P, Bucholz E, Dziura J, Bhandari V. Impact of Early Extubation and Reintubation on the Incidence of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Neonates. Am J Perinatol. 2014;31:1063–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Isayama T, Chai-Adisaksopha C, McDonald SD. Noninvasive ventilation with vs without early surfactant to prevent chronic lung disease in preterm infants: a systematic review and metaanalysis. JAMA Pediatrics 2015;169:731–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parsons LS. Performing a 1:N Case-Control Match on Propensity Score. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual SAS Users Group International Conference, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 2001.

  13. Lumley T, Diehr P, Emerson S, Chen L. The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets. Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:151–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhandari V. Non-Invasive respiratory support in the preterm infant. Clin Perinatol. 2012;29:497–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilinska M, Bachman T, Swietlinski J, Gajewska E, Meller J, Helwich E, et al. Impact of the shift to neonatal invasive ventilation in Poland: a population study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014;15:155–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhandari V. The potential of non-invasive ventilation of decrease BPD. Semin Perinatol. 2013;37:108–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Morley CJ, Davis PG, Doyle LW, Brion LP, Hascoet JM, Carlin JP, et al. Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:700–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Leveque BM, Kalish LA, LaPierre J, Welch M, Porter V. Impact of implementing 5 potentially better respiratory practices on neonatal outcomes and costs. Pediatrics. 2011;128:e218–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kann IC, Solevag AL. Economic and health consequences of non-invasive respiratory support in newborn infants: a difference-in-difference analysis using data from the Norwegian patient registry. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Dr. AL is supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (KL2TR001854).

Author contributions

Mr. TAC and Dr. AL made substantial contributions to designing the study, analyzing the data, and interpreting the results, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Dr. AL made substantial contributions to designing the study, analyzing the data, and interpreting the results. Ms. LF wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Drs. NI, TAS, AG, PSF, and RR also assisted in interpreting the results and revising the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved of the final version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashwini Lakshmanan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chavez, T.A., Lakshmanan, A., Figueroa, L. et al. Resource utilization patterns using non-invasive ventilation in neonates with respiratory distress syndrome. J Perinatol 38, 850–856 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0122-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0122-y

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links