Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

National trends in neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the United States

Abstract

Objective

To determine trends in neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) utilization from 2002–2011.

Study design

Using the Nationwide inpatient sample (NIS), we conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study to identify ECMO utilization among neonates. Incidence of ECMO utilization, length of stay (LOS), cost and mortality were estimated.

Result

In all, 33,367,146 neonates were identified of which 7603 (18 per 100,000 live births) underwent ECMO. Neonatal ECMO increased from 12 to 23 runs per 100,000 live births. Mortality was 48.4%, decreasing from 47.5 to 41.9% between 2002 and 2011. On multivariate analysis, mortality was significantly higher for infectious indications (OR 4.1; CI 1.1–16.0), E-CPR (OR 3.8; CI 1.4–10.7) and cardiac indications (OR 2.0; CI 1.5–2.8). On hierarchical regression, LOS increased by 1.6 days each year (p = 0.02) and cost of hospitalization increased by $14,033 each year (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Neonatal ECMO utilization increased, while mortality decreased during the study period. These findings suggest an improvement in neonatal ECMO care.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bartlett RH, Gazzaniga AB, Jefferies MR, Huxtable RF, Haiduc NJ, Fong SW. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) cardiopulmonary support in infancy. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 1976;22:80–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbaro RP, Paden ML, Guner YS, Raman L, Ryerson LM, Alexander P, et al. Pediatric Extracorporeal life support organization registry international report 2016. ASAIO J. 2017;63:456–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Petrou S, Bischof M, Bennett C, Elbourne D, Field D, McNally H, et al. Cost-effectiveness of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation based on 7-year results from the United Kingdom Collaborative ECMO Trial. Pediatrics. 2006;117:1640–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mattox KL, Beall AC. Resuscitation of the moribund patient using portable cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1976;22:436–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McMullan DM, Thiagarajan RR, Smith KM, Rycus PT, Brogan TV. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcomes in term and premature neonates. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014;15:e9–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barbaro RP, Odetola FO, Kidwell KM, Paden ML, Bartlett RH, Davis MM, et al. Association of hospital-level volume of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases and mortality. analysis of the extracorporeal life support organization registry. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191:894–901.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bokman CL, Tashiro J, Perez EA, Lasko DS, Sola JE. Determinants of survival and resource utilization for pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the United States 1997-2009. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50:809–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Freeman CL, Bennett TD, Casper TC, Larsen GY, Hubbard A, Wilkes J, et al. Pediatric and neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:512–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Gray BW, Haft JW, Hirsch JC, Annich GM, Hirschl RB, Bartlett RH. Extracorporeal life support: experience with 2,000 patients. ASAIO J. 2015;61:2–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Davis JS, Ryan ML, Perez EA, Neville HL, Bronson SN, Sola JE. ECMO hospital volume and survival in congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair. J Surg Res. 2012;178:791–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Prodhan P, Bhutta AT, Gossett JM, Stroud MH, Rycus PT, Bratton SL, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support among children with adenovirus infection: a review of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. ASAIO J. 2014;60:49–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zabrocki LA, Brogan TV, Statler KD, Poss WB, Rollins MD, Bratton SL. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for pediatric respiratory failure: Survival and predictors of mortality. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:364–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chan T, Thiagarajan RR, Frank D, Bratton SL. Survival after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in infants and children with heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:984–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Raymond TT, Cunnyngham CB, Thompson MT, Thomas JA, Dalton HJ, Nadkarni VM, et al. Outcomes among neonates, infants, and children after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory in-hospital pediatric cardiac arrest: A report from the National Registry of CardioPulmonary Resuscitation*. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009;11:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville M. HCUP National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). 2015. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/nisdbdocumentation.jsp (accessed 3 Oct 2017).

  16. Tashiro J, Wang B, Sola JE, Hogan AR, Neville HL, Perez EA. Patent ductus arteriosus ligation in premature infants in the United States. J Surg Res. 2014;190:613–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Burke BL, Robbins JM, Mac BT, Hobbs CA, Nesmith C, Tilford JM. Trends in hospitalizations for neonatal jaundice and kernicterus in the United States, 1988-2005. Pediatrics. 2009;123:524–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Westfall JM, McGloin J. Impact of double counting and transfer bias on estimated rates and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction. Med Care. 2001;39:459–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lowry AW, Morales DLS, Graves DE, Knudson JD, Shamszad P, Mott AR, et al. Characterization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for pediatric cardiac arrest in the United States: Analysis of the kids’ inpatient database. Pediatr Cardiol. 2013;34:1422–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville M. HCUP Cost-to-Charge Ratio Files (CCR). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/state/costtocharge.jsp.

  21. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. CPI Inflation Calculator. https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm (accessed 22 Dec 2017).

  22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). CDC WONDER. https://wonder.cdc.gov/ (accessed 7 Mar 2018).

  23. Chu, B, Steiner, C, Houchens R. Hierarchical modeling using HCUP data report# 2007–01. HCUP Methods Ser. 2007. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2007_01.pdf (accessed 22 Dec 2017).

  24. Song AY, Chen H-HA, Chapman R, Govindarajan A, Upperman JS, Burke RV, et al. Utilization patterns of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in neonates in the United States 1997-2012. J Pediatr Surg. 2017;52:1681–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lawson S, Ellis C, Butler K, McRobb C, Mejak B. Neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation devices, techniques and team roles: 2011 survey results of the United States’ Extracorporeal Life Support Organization centers. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2011;43:236–44.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). https://www.elso.org.

  27. Di Nardo M, MacLaren G, Marano M, Cecchetti C, Bernaschi P, Amodeo A. ECLS in pediatric cardiac patients. Front Pediatr. 2016;4:109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Chapman R, Peterec S, Bizzarro M, Mercurio M. Patient selection for neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: beyond severity of illness. J Perinatol. 2009;29:606–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville M. HCUP Databases. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). March 2017. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/kidoverview.jsp (accessed 2 Apr 2018).

  30. Thiagarajan RR, Barbaro RP, Rycus PT, Mcmullan DM, Conrad SA, Fortenberry JD, et al. Extracorporeal life support organization registry international report 2016. ASAIO J. 2017;63:60–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Faraoni D, Nasr VG, DiNardo JA, Thiagarajan RR. Hospital costs for neonates and children supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Pediatr. 2016;169:69–75.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization-ECMO and ECLS Membership and Center Map. https://www.elso.org/Membership/CenterMap.aspx (accessed 28 Mar 2018).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD and its partner organizations that provide data to the HCUP. A list of all HCUP data partners is available at https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/hcupdatapartners.jsp

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeenia Billimoria.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhatt, P., Lekshminarayanan, A., Donda, K. et al. National trends in neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the United States. J Perinatol 38, 1106–1113 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0129-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0129-4

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links