Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Tube feeding outcomes of infants in a Level IV NICU

Abstract

Background

NICU patients are commonly discharged home with nasogastric (NG) or gastrostomy (G-tube) feeding, but wide practice variation exists. The objective of this study was to evaluate feeding and growth outcomes and complications in NICU patients discharged home with NG or G-tube feeding.

Study design

Retrospective cohort study of infants discharged from a Level IV NICU with an NG or G-tube who had follow up to 1 year. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between groups.

Results

The study sample included 264 infants: 140 with NG and 124 with G-tube. More infants in the G-tube group (65%) still required tube feedings 12 months post-discharge than infants in the NG group (24%). Infants in the G-tube group had more tube-related ER visits than infants in the NG group. Growth outcomes did not differ.

Conclusion

Home NG feeding may be a safe alternative to a surgically placed G-tube in select NICU patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jadcherla S. Dysphagia in the high-risk infant: potential factors and mechanisms. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103:622S–8S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. da Costa SP, van den Engel-Hoek L, Bos AF. Sucking and swallowing in infants and diagnostic tools. J Perinatol. 2008;28:247–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Correa JA, Fallon SC, Murphy KM, Victorian VA, Bisset GS, Vasudevan SA, et al. Resource utilization after gastrostomy tube placement: defining areas of improvement for future quality improvement projects. J Pedia Surg. 2014;49:1598–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Crosby J, Duerksen D. A retrospective survey of tube-related complications in patients receiving long-term home enteral nutrition. Dig Dis Sci. 2005;50:1712–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Quandt D, Schraner T, Ulrich Bucher H, Arlettaz Mieth R. Malposition of feeding tubes in neonates: is it an issue? J Pedia Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009;48:608–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Parker LA, Withers JH, Talaga E. Comparison of neonatal nursing practices for determining feeding tube insertion length and verifying gastric placement with current best evidence. Adv Neonatal Care. 2018;18:307–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoogewerf M, Ter Horst HJ, Groen H, Nieuwenhuis T, Bos AF, van Dijk MWG. The prevalence of feeding problems in children formerly treated in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol 2017;37:578–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Greene NH, Greenberg RG, O’Brien SM, Kemper AR, Miranda ML, Clark RH, et al. Variation in gastrostomy tube placement in premature infants in the United States. Am J Perinatol. 2018. [Epub ahead of print]

  9. González-Gil T. Early discharge with home support of gavage feeding for stable preterm infants who have not established full oral feeds. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2016;14:34–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosen D, Schneider R, Bao R, Burke P, Ceballos C, Hoffstadter-Thal K, et al. Home nasogastric feeds: feeding status and growth outcomes in a pediatric population. J Parent Enter Nutr. 2016;40:350–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Khalil ST, Uhing MR, Duesing L, Visotcky A, Tarima S, Nghiem-Rao TH. Outcomes of infants with home tube feeding: comparing nasogastric vs gastrostomy tubes. J Parent Enter Nutr. 2017;41:1380–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fox D, Campagna EJ, Friedlander J, Partrick DA, Rees DI, Kempe A. National trends and outcomes of pediatric gastrostomy tube placement. J Pedia Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014;59:582–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Landisch RM, Colwell RC, Densmore JC. Infant gastrostomy outcomes: the cost of complications. J Pedia Surg. 2016;51:1976–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie L. Merhar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Williams, S.L., Popowics, N.M., Tadesse, D.G. et al. Tube feeding outcomes of infants in a Level IV NICU. J Perinatol 39, 1406–1410 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0449-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0449-z

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links