Table 3 Effect of treatment methods on CMV infectivity of breastmilk.
Name of treatment method | Relevant articles | Results | Inference |
---|---|---|---|
Freezing | Welsh et al. [18], Dworsky et al. [19], Hamprecht et al. [4], Hosseini et al. [16], Sam et al. [17] | Mean viral infectivity was reduced by 90% in some studies but increased by 10% in others | Evidence regarding efficacy of freezing is conflicting. Freezing is ineffective in reducing viral loads to non-transmissible levels. |
Holder Pasteurization (HoP) | Viral Infectivity reduction = 100% in all studies | Low Temperature Long Time conditions of HoP are most effective in eradicating CMV. | |
High Temperature Short Time (HTST) | Maschmann et al. [40] | Mean viral infectivity was reduced by 100% at 72 degrees for 5 s. | HTST is effective at eradicating CMV. More evidence is needed to corroborate. |
Microwave Irradiation | Mean Viral Infectivity reduced by about 90% at 500 W, 30 s, and by 100% at 750 W, 30 s. | Microwave Irradiation is effective at eradicating CMV at high powers. More evidence is needed to corroborate. | |
UV-C Irradiation | Lloyd et al. [21] | Mean viral infectivity was reduced by 54.5% | UV-C irradiation can significantly reduce CMV but lacks efficacy to reduce it to non-transmissible levels. More evidence is needed to corroborate. |
High Pressure Processing | Pitino et al. [9] | Mean viral infectivity was reduced to undetectable levels (manually estimated to >89% reduction in viral titres) | HPP reduces CMV significantly, but not as effectively as HoP or HTST. More studies are needed to corroborate. |