Table 3 Estimated 10-year PFS rates.

From: Long-term outcomes with frontline nilotinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: ENESTnd 10-year analysis

 

Nilotinib 300 mg twice daily

Nilotinib 400 mg twice daily

Imatinib 400 mg once daily

PFS on study

 All patients, n

282

281

283

  PFS events, n

36

25

32

  Estimated rate of PFS, % (95% CI)

   At 5 years

92.3 (89.1–95.4)

95.9 (93.5–98.3)

91.2 (87.8–94.5)

   At 10 years

86.2 (81.9–90.5)

89.9 (86.1–93.8)

87.2 (83.0–91.4)

  HR vs imatinib (95% CI)

1.08 (0.67–1.74)

0.74 (0.44–1.25)

NA

  P vs imatinib

0.75

0.27

NA

PFS on study by age at baseline

 Patients <60 years, na

223

228

224

  PFS events in patients <60 years, n

17

12

24

  Estimated rate of PFS at 10 years, % (95% CI)

91.8 (88.0–95.5)

94.1 (90.8–97.3)

88.3 (83.9–92.8)

 Patients ≥60 years, na

59

53

59

  PFS events in patients ≥60 years, n

19

13

8

  Estimated rate of PFS at 10 years, % (95% CI)

63.7 (50.2–77.3)

69.4 (54.5–84.2)

83.6 (73.0–94.2)

PFS on study by Sokal risk score at baseline

 Patients in low Sokal risk group, na

103

103

104

  PFS events, n

6

5

2

  Estimated rate of PFS at 10 years, % (95% CI)

93.7 (88.9–98.6)

94.1 (89.1–99.1)

97.5 (94.2–100)

 Patients in intermediate Sokal risk group, na

101

100

101

  PFS events, n

13

9

15

  Estimated rate of PFS at 10 years, % (95% CI)

87.1 (80.2–93.9)

89.6 (83.2–96.1)

83.6 (75.8–91.4)

 Patients in high Sokal risk group, na

78

78

78

  PFS events, n

17

11

15

  Estimated rate of PFS at 10 years, % (95% CI)

74.0 (63.2–84.8)

84.6 (75.7–93.6)

77.7 (67.6–87.9)

  1. NA indicates not applicable.
  2. aThe evaluable n for each analysis.