Table 1 a. Clinical characteristics at diagnosis and TCR status, b. Refractoriness to proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory imide drugs and monoclonal antibodies, c. First salvage treatment post triple refractory status.

From: Outcomes of triple class (proteasome inhibitor, IMiDs and monoclonal antibody) refractory patients with multiple myeloma

a. Clinical characteristics at diagnosis and TCR statusClinical characteristics at diagnosis and TCR status

Parameter

At diagnosis

At TCR disease

Age at diagnosis, median (range)

61.3 (31–89)

64.6 (32–93)

Sex, % females

39

–

International staging system (ISS; n = 207)

 

c

 Stage I

23%

 

 Stage II

32%

 

 Stage III

45%

 

Revised ISS (n = 177)

 

–

 Stage I

14%

 

 Stage II

56%

 

 Stage III

30%

 

High-risk cytogenetics

56%

86% (95/110)

 (based on mSMART 3.0 classification)

(116/208)

 

 Specific cytogenetic features

  

 t(4;14)

19% (37/198)

20% (21/106)

 t(11;14)

24% (47/199)

24% (25/105)

 Deletion 17p

22% (44/199)

38% (41/109)

 t(14;16)/t(14;20)

9% (17/195)

4% (4/105)

 1q gain

55% (76/136)

74% (81/110)

 Deletion 1p

9% (11/121)

4% (4/103)

b Refractoriness to proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory imide drugs and monoclonal antibodies

Drug class

N = 249 (%)

Proteasome inhibitors

 

Bortezomib

41 (16)

Carfilzomib

25 (10)

Ixazomib

14 (6)

Bortezomib + carfilzomib

103(41)

Bortezomib + ixazomib

17 (7)

Carfilzomib + ixazomib

11 (4)

Bortezomib + carfilzomib + ixazomib

38 (15)

Immunomodulatory drugs

 

Lenalidomide

53 (21)

Pomalidomide

29 (12)

Thalidomide

1 (0.4)

Lenalidomide and pomalidomide

138 (55)

Lenalidomide, pomalidomide and thalidomide

28 (11)

Monoclonal antibodies

 

Daratumumab

185 (74)

Elotuzumab

5 (2)

Daratumumab and elotuzumab

48 (19)

Daratumumab and isatuximab

4 (2)

Daratumumab, elotuzumab and isatuximab

7 (3)

c First salvage treatment post triple refractory status.

Drug class

N = 227 (%)

1.

PI + IMiD therapy (without mAb, venetoclax or bendamustine)

57 (25)

2.

Monoclonal antibody-based therapies (include combination with PIs, IMiDs, but not venetoclax)

50 (22)

CD38-based

34 (15)

Elotuzumab-based

16 (7)

3.

VDT-PACE like regimens

37 (16)

4.

PI-based therapies (without IMiD, mAbs or venetoclax)

27 (12)

5.

Alkylator combinations (without PI, IMiD, mAb or venetoclax)

17 (7)

6.

Venetoclax-based regimens (including combination with PIs, IMiDs, mAbs, bendamustine)

11 (5)

7.

CAR-T therapy

7 (4)

8.

IMiD based therapies (without PIs, mAbs or venetoclax)

6 (3)

9.

Bendamustine-based combinations (includes PIs, IMiDs, mAbs, no venetoclax)

5 (2)

10.

BCMA-directed antibodies

4 (2)

11.

Miscellaneousa

6 (3)

  1. Percentages are rounded off.
  2. BCMA B cell maturation antigen, CAR-T chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy, IMiD immunomodulatory imide drugs, mAbs monoclonal antibodies, PI proteasome inhibitor.
  3. aIncludes 2 patients with radiation therapy alone, 1 allogenic transplant, 1 selinexor-dexamethasone, 1 high dose methylprednisone, 1 investigational drug (PT-112).