Fig. 3: Tal1 and Lmo2 promote DN3 label retention during leukemogenesis. | Leukemia

Fig. 3: Tal1 and Lmo2 promote DN3 label retention during leukemogenesis.

From: The role of quiescent thymic progenitors in TAL/LMO2-induced T-ALL chemotolerance

Fig. 3

A Design of in vivo label retention studies using the doxycycline-inducible H2B-GFP mouse reporter. B Representative flow cytometry plots of WT (top row) and preleukemic Tal1/Lmo2 (bottom row) thymi after pulse-chase. Left column, gated on single cells, middle column gated on DN, right column gated on DN3 cells. Quantification of (C), percentage of DN3 cells scored as GFPHI after the 2-week chase period (D), total DN3 GFPHI thymocytes and (E), total GFPLO DN3 thymocytes in WT (n = 17; gray), preleukemic Tal1 (n = 11; green), preleukemic Lmo2 (n = 16; green), preleukemic Tal1/Lmo2 (n = 12; green) mice, or leukemic mice chased for 2–3 weeks (T-ALL; n = 8; red). F Representative FACS plots of T-ALL cells after pulse-chase showing co-staining for DN3a/DN3b subpopulations. From left to right, cells were gated on singlets, DN, total DN3 cells, DN3 GFPHI and DN3 GFPLO. First DN3 plot gated shows label retention of all DN3 cells and second plot shows DN3a/b distribution among DN3 cells. Gating on DN3 GFPHI and DN3 GFPLO shows that dormant cells are significantly enriched among the DN3a subpopulation. G Left panel, quantification of the percentage of total, GFPHI or GFPLO leukemic DN3 cells that scored as DN3a or DN3b (n = 5). Right panel, pie chart showing the relative frequencies of each leukemic subpopulation, with GFPHI cells comprising a minor fraction (0.64%) of the DN3a subpopulation. All error bars represent mean \(\pm \,\)SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

Back to article page