Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA

Comparison of induction with arsenic trioxide or chemotherapy in a real-world cohort of patients with high-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia

Abstract

Front-line treatment with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) is superior to standard ATRA and chemotherapy (CHT) in patients with low-/intermediate-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). However, for high-risk (HR) patients (defined as those with a white blood cell count ≥ 10×10⁹/L), the role of ATRA-ATO is subject to debate, and study data are scarce. The objective for the present real-world cohort study was to assess the outcomes in 135 HR APL patients treated with ATRA-CHT or ATRA-ATO during induction at 12 French hospitals between 2010 and 2021. Of the 135 patients, 50 (37%) received ATRA-ATO as induction therapy (though combination with cytoreductive treatment was usually necessary), and 85 received standard ATRA-CHT (“CHT group”). The complete response rates were 90% in the ATRA-ATO group and 76% in the CHT group (p = 0.052). The five-year overall survival (OS) rate was significantly higher in the ATRA-ATO group (89.86% [95% confidence interval: 81.81–98.70]) than in the CHT group (72.69% [63.30–83.47]; p = 0.035). The combination of ATRA and ATO was effective and safe in this large, real-world cohort of HR APL patients. The forthcoming results of the APOLLO trial (a direct comparison of ATRA-ATO with ATRA-CHT) might validate our present findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available on request.

References

  1. Adès L, Thomas X, Bresler AG, Raffoux E, Spertini O, Vey N, et al. Arsenic trioxide is required in the treatment of newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia. Analysis of a randomized trial (APL 2006) by the French Belgian Swiss APL group. Haematologica. 2018;103:2033–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Burnett AK, Russell NH, Hills RK, Bowen D, Kell J, Knapper S, et al. Arsenic trioxide and all-trans retinoic acid treatment for acute promyelocytic leukaemia in all risk groups (AML17): results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1295–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jen W-Y, Marvin-Peek J, Kantarjian HM, Alvarado Y, Borthakur G, Jabbour E, et al. Long-term follow-up of a phase 2 study of all-trans retinoic acid, arsenic trioxide, and gemtuzumab ozogamicin in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Cancer. 2025;131:e35662.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bewersdorf JP, Prozora S, Podoltsev NA, Shallis RM, Huntington SF, Neparidze N, et al. Practice patterns and real-life outcomes for patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia in the United States. Blood Adv. 2022;6:376–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kayser S, Rahmé R, Martínez-Cuadrón D, Ghiaur G, Thomas X, Sobas M, et al. Outcome of older (≥70 years) APL patients frontline treated with or without arsenic trioxide-an International Collaborative Study. Leukemia. 2020;34:2333–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Mitelman F. ISCN: An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. S. Karger. Basel, 1995.

  7. Powell BL, Moser B, Stock W, Gallagher RE, Willman CL, Stone RM, et al. Arsenic trioxide improves event-free and overall survival for adults with acute promyelocytic leukemia: North American Leukemia Intergroup Study C9710. Blood. 2010;116:3751–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sanz MA, Montesinos P, Vellenga E, Rayón C, De La Serna J, Parody R, et al. Risk-adapted treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia with all-trans retinoic acid and anthracycline monochemotherapy: long-term outcome of the LPA 99 multicenter study by the PETHEMA Group. Blood. 2008;112:3130–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Muchtar E, Vidal L, Ram R, Gafter-Gvili A, Shpilberg O, Raanani P. The role of maintenance therapy in acute promyelocytic leukemia in the first complete remission. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009594.pub2.

  10. Döhner H, Wei AH, Appelbaum FR, Craddock C, DiNardo CD, Dombret H, et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN. Blood. 2022;140:1345–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ravandi F, Estey EH, Cortes JE, O’Brien S, Pierce SA, Brandt M, et al. Phase II Study of All-Trans Retinoic Acid (ATRA), Arsenic Trioxide (ATO), with or without Gemtuzumab OzogamIcin (GO) for the Frontline Therapy of Patients with Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL). Blood. 2010;116:1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lancet JE, Moseley AB, Coutre SE, DeAngelo DJ, Othus M, Tallman MS, et al. A phase 2 study of ATRA, arsenic trioxide, and gemtuzumab ozogamicin in patients with high-risk APL (SWOG 0535). Blood Adv. 2020;4:1683–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Silva WFda, Rosa LIda, Marquez GL, Bassolli L, Tucunduva L, Silveira DRA, et al. Real-life Outcomes on Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia in Brazil - Early Deaths Are Still a Problem. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019;19:e116–e122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Akcay OF, Yeter HH, Buyukasik Y. Real-life outcomes of unselected acute promyelocytic leukemia patients: a single-center 14-year experience. Rom J Intern Med. 2020;58:138–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosati S, Gurnari C, Breccia M, Carmosino I, Scalzulli E, Montefusco E, et al. Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) in very old patients: real-life behind protocols. Acta Oncol. 2021;60:1520–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fontes HMF, de Freitas JP, Oliveira JHV, de Sousa Moraes ÉA, Rego EM, Melo RAM. Causes and risk factors for early death in adult patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia: a real-life experience. Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2024;46:S122–S128.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sanz MA, Martín G, González M, León A, Rayón C, Rivas C, et al. Risk-adapted treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia with all-trans-retinoic acid and anthracycline monochemotherapy: a multicenter study by the PETHEMA group. Blood. 2004;103:1237–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Voso MT, Guarnera L, Lehmann S, Döhner K, Döhner H, Platzbecker U, et al. Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: Long-Term Outcomes from the HARMONY Project. Blood 2024; blood.2024026186.

  19. Salamero O, Martínez-Cuadrón D, Sobas M, Benavente C, Vives S, De la Serna J, et al. Real life outcomes of patients aged ≥75 years old with acute promyelocytic leukemia: experience of the PETHEMA registry. Leuk Lymphoma. 2019;60:2720–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lehmann S, Ravn A, Carlsson L, Antunovic P, Deneberg S, Möllgård L, et al. Continuing high early death rate in acute promyelocytic leukemia: a population-based report from the Swedish Adult Acute Leukemia Registry. Leukemia. 2011;25:1128–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Montesinos P, Bergua JM, Vellenga E, Rayón C, Parody R, De La Serna J, et al. Differentiation syndrome in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with all-trans retinoic acid and anthracycline chemotherapy: characteristics, outcome, and prognostic factors. Blood. 2009;113:775–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lo-Coco F, Avvisati G, Vignetti M, Thiede C, Orlando SM, Iacobelli S, et al. Retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide for acute promyelocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:111–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Platzbecker U, Adès L, Montesinos P, Ammatuna E, Fenaux P, Baldus C et al. First results of the APOLLO trial: a randomized phase III study to compare ATO combined with ATRA versus standard AIDA regimen for patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia. EHA Library. 06/13/2024; 422206; S102.

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific funding from agencies or organizations in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LA and DL designed the study; DL and AD collected, controlled the database and analyzed data; BC, MH, SB, CB, AZ, ML, CB, ND, CW, MPGH, MO, TC, FC, AC, CR, MHB, ER, PF included and treated patients; AD performed the statistical analysis; AD, LA and DL wrote the manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript for critical content and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Delphine Lebon or Lionel Adès.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the manuscript’s content.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was approved by the French National Consultative Committee on Information Processing in Medical Research (Comité Consultatif sur le Traitement de l’Information en matière de Recherche dans le domaine de la Santé, Paris, France; reference: 15.414), and the study database was registered with the French National Data Protection Commission (Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés, Paris, France; reference: DR-2015-534). Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lebon, D., Da Rocha, A., Cassinat, B. et al. Comparison of induction with arsenic trioxide or chemotherapy in a real-world cohort of patients with high-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia. Leukemia 39, 1865–1870 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-025-02663-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-025-02663-x

Search

Quick links