Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Risk stratification of patients with TP53-mutated myeloproliferative neoplasms

Abstract

While TP53 mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are associated with an increased risk of leukemic transformation, not all patients carrying a TP53 mutation progress. To better risk-stratify MPN patients with TP53 mutations, we analyzed data from 1540 patients treated at four specialized cancer centers. Among them, 1429 had wildtype TP53 and 111 had mutations in the TP53 gene. At first MPN diagnosis, 32% had polycythemia vera, 39% had essential thrombocythemia, and 25% had primary myelofibrosis. Among all MPN patients with TP53 mutations, presence of fibrosis in the bone marrow (hazard ratio (HR): 3.84, 95% CI: 1.98–7.43), multi-hit TP53 mutation status (HR: 2.74, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.52–4.97), and higher PHANTM score (HR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.02–3.42) were associated with worse OS in a multivariable analysis. Based on these variables, we developed a risk model to identify TP53-mutated MPN patients who are at high risk for inferior OS. Median OS from time of TP53 detection was 0.5 years in high-risk patients, compared to 2.3 years for patients with intermediate risk and 6.3 years for patients with low risk. This scoring system may help refine risk stratification for chronic phase MPN patients harboring TP53 aberrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Overall survival and leukemia-free survival based on TP53 status and MPN diagnosis.
Fig. 2: Overall and leukemia-free survival from the time of first detection of a TP53 mutation based on fibrosis status.
Fig. 3: Overall and leukemia-free survival from time of first detection of a TP53 mutation based on TP53 status.
Fig. 4: Overall and leukemia-free survival from time of first detection of a TP53 mutation in all single-hit patients based on PHANTM and CRISPR relative fitness score (RFS) score.
Fig. 5: Overall and leukemia-free survival from time at first detection of a TP53 mutation based on Fibrosis, Multi-hit status, and PHANTM (FMP) risk score.

Data availability

The data will be made available upon request.

References

  1. Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, Rotunno G, Mudireddy M, Mannarelli C, Nicolosi M, et al. MIPSS70: mutation-enhanced international prognostic score system for transplantation-age patients with primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:310–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Nicolosi M, Mannelli F, Mudireddy M, Bartalucci N, et al. GIPSS: genetically inspired prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2018;32:1631–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, Coltro G, Finke CM, Loscocco GG, et al. Mutation-enhanced international prognostic systems for essential thrombocythaemia and polycythaemia vera. Br J Haematol. 2020;189:291–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian RP, Borowitz MJ, Calvo KR, Kvasnicka H-M, et al. International consensus classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias: integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data. Blood. 2022;140:1200–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. McNamara CJ, Panzarella T, Kennedy JA, Arruda A, Claudio JO, Daher-Reyes G, et al. The mutational landscape of accelerated- and blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms impacts patient outcomes. Blood Adv. 2018;2:2658–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Loscocco GG, Rotunno G, Mannelli F, Coltro G, Gesullo F, Pancani F, et al. The prognostic contribution of CBL, NRAS, KRAS, RUNX1, and TP53 mutations to mutation-enhanced international prognostic score systems (MIPSS70/plus/plus v2.0) for primary myelofibrosis. Am J Hematol. 2024;99:68–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gagelmann N, Badbaran A, Salit RB, Schroeder T, Gurnari C, Pagliuca S, et al. Impact of TP53 on outcome of patients with myelofibrosis undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2023;141:2901–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Raza S, Viswanatha D, Frederick L, Lasho T, Finke C, Knudson R, et al. TP53 mutations and polymorphisms in primary myelofibrosis. Am J Hematol. 2012;87:204–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kubesova B, Pavlova S, Malcikova J, Kabathova J, Radova L, Tom N, et al. Low-burden TP53 mutations in chronic phase of myeloproliferative neoplasms: association with age, hydroxyurea administration, disease type and JAK2 mutational status. Leukemia. 2018;32:450–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grinfeld J, Nangalia J, Baxter EJ, Wedge DC, Angelopoulos N, Cantrill R, et al. Classification and personalized prognosis in myeloproliferative neoplasms. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1416–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen S, Wang Q, Yu H, Capitano ML, Vemula S, Nabinger SC, et al. Mutant p53 drives clonal hematopoiesis through modulating epigenetic pathway. Nat Commun. 2019;10:5649.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Giacomelli AO, Yang X, Lintner RE, McFarland JM, Duby M, Kim J, et al. Mutational processes shape the landscape of TP53 mutations in human cancer. Nat Genet. 2018;50:1381–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Funk JS, Klimovich M, Drangenstein D, Pielhoop O, Hunold P, Borowek A, et al. Deep CRISPR mutagenesis characterizes the functional diversity of TP53 mutations. Nat Genet. 2025;57:140–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Boettcher S, Miller PG, Sharma R, McConkey M, Leventhal M, Krivtsov AV, et al. A dominant-negative effect drives selection of TP53 missense mutations in myeloid malignancies. Science. 2019;365:599–604.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Tefferi A, Abdelmagid M, Loscocco GG, Fathima S, Begna KH, Al-Kali A, et al. TP53 mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms: context-dependent evaluation of prognostic relevance. Am J Hematol. 2025;100:552–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Badar T, Foran JM, Bewersdorf JP, Wang Y-H, Coltoff A, El Kettani M, et al. Heterogeneity in outcomes of TP53-mutated myeloproliferative neoplasms based on disease phenotype and mutational status. Br JHaematol 2025;207:683–6.

  17. Senapati J, Loghavi S, Garcia-Manero G, Tang G, Kadia T, Short NJ, et al. Clinical interrogation of TP53 aberrations and their impact on survival in patients with myeloid neoplasms. Haematologica 2024;110:1304–15.

  18. Bahaj W, Kewan T, Gurnari C, Durmaz A, Ponvilawan B, Pandit I, et al. Novel scheme for defining the clinical implications of TP53 mutations in myeloid neoplasia. J Hematol Oncol. 2023;16:91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Khoury JD, Solary E, Abla O, Akkari Y, Alaggio R, Apperley JF, et al. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification of haematolymphoid tumours: myeloid and histiocytic/dendritic neoplasms. Leukemia. 2022;36:1703–19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Shah MV, Hung K, Baranwal A, Wechalekar G, Al-Kali A, Toop CR, et al. Validation of the 5th edition of the World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification guidelines for TP53-mutated myeloid neoplasm in an independent international cohort. Blood Cancer J. 2025;15:88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Yabe M, Omarbekova AZ, Hsu M, May H, Arcila ME, Liu Y, et al. TP53 combined phenotype score is associated with the clinical outcome of TP53-mutated myelodysplastic syndromes. Cancers 2021;13:5502.

  22. Vannucchi AM, Lasho TL, Guglielmelli P, Biamonte F, Pardanani A, Pereira A, et al. Mutations and prognosis in primary myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2013;27:1861–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, Gangat N, Ketterling RP, Pardanani A, et al. MIPSS70+ version 2.0: mutation and karyotype-enhanced international prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1769–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bernard E, Nannya Y, Hasserjian RP, Devlin SM, Tuechler H, Medina-Martinez JS, et al. Implications of TP53 allelic state for genome stability, clinical presentation and outcomes in myelodysplastic syndromes. Nat Med. 2020;26:1549–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Maslah N, Verger E, Giraudier S, Chea M, Hoffman R, Mascarenhas J, et al. Single-cell analysis reveals selection of TP53-mutated clones after MDM2 inhibition. Blood Adv. 2022;6:2813–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Demajo S, Ramis-Zaldivar JE, Muiños F, Grau ML, Andrianova M, López-Bigas N, et al. Identification of clonal hematopoiesis driver mutations through in silico saturation mutagenesis. Cancer Discov. 2024;14:1717–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao Y, Guo J, Zhao S, Wang R, Shi L, Fang Y, et al. Bone marrow fibrosis at diagnosis and during the course of disease is associated with TP53 mutations and adverse prognosis in primary myelodysplastic syndrome. Cancers. 2022;14:2984.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Verma T, Papadantonakis N, Peker Barclift D, Zhang L. Molecular genetic profile of myelofibrosis: implications in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment advancements. Cancers. 2024;16:514.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Bao Y-N, Yang Q, Shen X-L, Yu W-K, Zhou L, Zhu Q-R, et al. Targeting tumor suppressor p53 for organ fibrosis therapy. Cell Death Dis. 2024;15:336.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Rodriguez-Meira A, Norfo R, Wen S, Chédeville AL, Rahman H, O’Sullivan J, et al. Single-cell multi-omics identifies chronic inflammation as a driver of TP53-mutant leukemic evolution. Nat Genet. 2023;55:1531–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Melody M, Al Ali N, Zhang L, Ramadan H, Padron E, Sallman D, et al. Decoding Bone Marrow Fibrosis in Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2020;20:324–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Duarte, Barbosa FB, Jesus Dos Santos MC, Lemes TE, Vasconcelos RPG, Vasconcelos JP, de PRL, et al. Bone marrow fibrosis at diagnosis is associated with TP53 overexpression and adverse prognosis in low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Br J Haematol. 2018;181:547–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all participating cancer centers for their outstanding collaboration. This study was supported by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Hematologic Malignancy Data Repository (HMDR). We thank the HMDR team for assisting us with data extraction. We thank the MPN Research Foundation (MPNRF) for helping support MPN data entry in HMDR at Dana-Farber.

Funding

BR received funding from the German Cancer Aid (“Deutsche Krebshilfe”, Mildred-Scheel scholarship, No.70114570). JE received honoraria from GSK and Novartis. AM acknowledges funding from NIH NHLBI (R01HL131835, R01 HL167139), Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (W81XWH2110909) and the Starr Cancer Consortium (I15-0026).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BR, MS, and AM conceptualized the project. BR, CMOF, MS, and AM wrote the original manuscript. AM provided clinical & scientific insights, edited the manuscript, obtained funding to support the research and provided supervision and oversight for the project. JK, YL, and MJA performed the major statistical analyses for the manuscript. BR, CMOF, NF, JB, CP, MSc, MRL, DJD, ShS, RMS, ACH, CK, LDW, LW, MW, JoH, AEM, RR, HKT, JG, VG, and MS provided clinical data, analyzed and interpreted the data. MF and HKT provided their genetic expertise, discussed the data with a focus on potential biological mechanisms and revised the manuscript. All authors provided scientific input and participated in the preparation of the manuscript. All authors agreed to the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Maximilian Stahl or Ann Mullally.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

MJA has financial interests in SeQure Dx. MS served on the advisory board for Novartis, Kymera, Sierra Oncology, GSK, Rigel, BMS, Sobi and Syndax, Kura; consulted for Boston Consulting, GLG and Dedham group and participated in CME activity for Novartis, Curis Oncology, Haymarket Media and Clinical Care Options and is a member of the Medical Safety Monitoring Board for Keros Pharmaceuticals. AM has received research funding from Morphic and Incyte and has consulted for Cellarity.

Ethics approval

Approval by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at each participating center was obtained according to their local policies. All participating centers signed a data transfer and use agreement with DFCI.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rolles, B., Filho, C.M.d.O., Fergusson, N. et al. Risk stratification of patients with TP53-mutated myeloproliferative neoplasms. Leukemia (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-026-02885-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-026-02885-7

Search

Quick links