Fig. 3: Further analysis of PSCs performance behind NN model with three parameters as input (the Eg of OMHP material, the energy difference ΔH and ΔL). | Light: Science & Applications

Fig. 3: Further analysis of PSCs performance behind NN model with three parameters as input (the Eg of OMHP material, the energy difference ΔH and ΔL).

From: Data-driven design of high-performance MASnxPb1-xI3 perovskite materials by machine learning and experimental realization

Fig. 3

a The maximum Jsc versus Eg; b the maximum Jsc versus ΔH; c the maximum Jsc versus ΔL; d the maximum Voc versus Eg; e the maximum Voc versus ΔH; f the maximum Voc versus ΔL. 2D-contour map of Jsc predictions at g Eg1; h Eg2; i Eg3, and 2D-contour map of Voc predictions at j Eg1; k Eg2; l Eg3. m 4D-scatter plot of PCE with respect to Eg, ΔH, and ΔL exhibiting that the highest PCE value is in the range of 1.30 eV to 1.40 eV. 2D-contour map of PCE predictions at n Eg1; o Eg2; p Eg3. Here, Eg1 = 1.20 eV, Eg2 = 1.30 eV, and Eg3 = 1.50 eV

Back to article page