Table 1 Success rates of our metaAgent over 100 language commands with different complexities

From: Electromagnetic metamaterial agent

Instructions

Steps

Success Rate (%)

TP

AS&DA

CG

TE

simple instructions

Where is the table?

1

100

100

100

100

Where is Alice?

1

100

100

100

98

Where is my cell phone?

1

97

100

98

93

Where is robot A?

1

98

100

98

94

Please locate the router.

1

96

100

98

93

Please check Bob’s breathing.

2

98

100

94

90

What happened to Alice?

2

94

100

96

89

Please check Bob’s health status.

2

90

98

92

84

Enhance the Wi-Fi signal in the corridor.

3

97

100

98

90

My cell phone cannot get a signal, please help me.

3

98

99

100

88

…

…

…

…

…

…

 

Average performances of all 50 simple commands

 

97.4

99.2

96.9

90.2

complex instructions

Please check the respiration rate of Bob and Alice.

4

94

98

99

87

What are Bob and Alice doing?

4

96

99

98

92

Robot A, please see me.

5

88

98

96

78

Robot A, take me to the corridor.

7

85

96

90

72

Please send this picture to Alice’s computer.

4

89

99

95

86

Let the robot A go to the pillbox and bring me my antihypertensive pills.

8

85

97

91

73

Please bring Bob his antihypertensive pills.

8

78

95

92

71

Let robot A to take the wooden block Bob’s holding to Alice.

9

75

95

89

72

Let robots A and B go to room A and the corridor respectively.

10

85

96

93

78

Bob needs help, his pressure is really high.

9

72

96

85

67

…

…

…

…

…

…

Average performances of all 50 complex commands

 

84.2

97.8

91.6

72.3

  1. Steps the number of steps required to complete the instruction, TP task planning, AS&DA action selection and device allocation, CG code generation, TE task execution
  2. In addition, we also report the average performances of all involved 50 simple and 50 complex commands, respectively. Note that only 10 simple and 10 complex commands are listed here due to the limited space