Table 3 Responses to the survey shown in Table 1 (n=33)

From: The use of Ki-67 labeling index to grade pulmonary well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms: current best evidence

Questions

Yes

 Is Ki-67 proliferative index useful for therapy?

100%

 Is Ki-67 proliferative index useful for prognosis?

81.8%

 What Ki-67 cut-off is a “poor prognostic feature”?

 

 5%

3.0%

 

 10%

6.1%

 

 >10%

90.9%

Does variability in NEN terminology affect practice?

63.6%

Is it important to determine low-grade NEN site of origin in patients with metastatic lesions

78.8%