Table 2 Distribution of selected histologic findings according to biochemical classifications

From: Histologic pattern is better correlated with clinical outcomes than biochemical classification in patients with drug-induced liver injury

Histologic feature

All cases

Biochemical presentation

P value

Ā 

Hepatocellular

Mixed

Cholestatic

(n = 88)

(n = 52)

(n = 18)

(n = 18)

Confluent necrosis score, median

1 (0,4)

2.5 (0,4)

0 (0,1)

0 (0,2)

0.001

Bridging necrosis score, median

0 (0,1)

0 (0,1)

0 (0,0.25)

0 (0,0)

0.018

Interface hepatitis score, median

1 (0,2)

2 (1,2)

0 (0,1)

0 (0,2)

<0.001

Chronic portal inflammation score, median

1 (0,2)

1 (0,2)

1 (0,2.25)

2 (0,3)

0.804

Eosinophils (N, %)

49 (56)

38 (73)

6 (33)

5 (28)

<0.001

Degree of necrosis seen

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

0.001

Ā  Ā Ā None (N, %)

3 (3)

0 (0)

1 (6)

2 (11)

Ā 

Ā  Ā Ā <5% (N, %)

17 (19)

3 (6)

7 (39)

7 (39)

Ā 

Ā  Ā Ā 5–33% (N, %)

33 (38)

22 (42)

7 (39)

4 (22)

Ā 

Ā  Ā  Ā 33–67% (N, %)

33 (38)

26 (50)

2 (11)

5 (28)

Ā 

Ā  Ā Ā >67% (N, %)

2 (2)

1 (2)

1 (6)

0 (0)

Ā 

Fibrosis stage, median

1 (0,2)

1 (0,2)

0.5 (0,2)

1 (0,2.25)

0.345

Cholestasis grade, median

0 (0,1)

0 (0,1)

0 (0,1.5)

1 (0,3)

0.101

Hepatocellular cholestasis (N, %)

24 (27)

9 (17)

5 (28)

10 (56)

0.307

Canalicular cholestasis (N, %)

25 (28)

13 (25)

4 (22)

8 (44)

0.060

Duct injury (multiple ducts) (N, %)

14 (16)

3 (6)

5 (28)

6 (33)

0.480

Ductal paucity seen

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

0.001

Ā  Ā Ā None (N, %)

74 (84)

49 (94)

15 (83)

10 (56)

Ā 

Ā  Ā Ā Mild (N, %)

7 (8)

2 (4)

0 (0)

5 (28)

Ā 

Ā  Ā Ā Moderate to marked (N, %)

7 (8)

1 (2)

3 (17)

3 (17)

Ā 

Ductular reaction seen (N, %)

71 (81)

48 (92)

12 (67)

11 (61)

0.003

  1. Three groups (hepatocellular, mixed, and cholestatic patients according to biochemical classification) were compared. P value stands for the overall difference among these groups